BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 791-795
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/17137072

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groves, A M
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, A K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groves, A M
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, A K

Full Paper

16 detector multislice CT versus skeletal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of wrist fractures: value of quantification of 99Tcm-MDP uptake

A M Groves, FRCR1, H K Cheow, FRCR2, K K Balan, FRCPI2, P W P Bearcroft, FRCR1 and A K Dixon, FRCR1

Departments of 1 Radiology and 2 Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital NHS Trust and the University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK

To compare the measured uptake of 99Tcm-methylene diphosphonate (99Tcm-MDP) in those scaphoid fractures seen on both 16 detector multislice CT and scintigraphy, with those seen only on scintigraphy. Over a 12 month period a total of 51 patients with suspected fracture underwent both conventional 99Tcm-MDP scintigraphy and 16 detector multislice CT on the same day. The 99Tcm-MDP uptake was then quantified in patients with identified fracture. This was measured by placing a region of interest (ROI) over the fracture site and the mean and maximum number of counts were compared with those in a similar size ROI placed over background bone activity. A total of 23 fractures were identified on scintigraphy of which 16 were also detected on CT (concordant). In seven cases the fracture was not seen on CT, even in retrospect (discordant). In the discordant cases, follow-up radiographs and MRI (where available) also failed to demonstrate a fracture. The mean fracture count to background bone activity ratio averaged 7.7 (range 3.2–18.5) for concordant fractures and 3.8 (range 1.7–5.3) for discordant fractures (t-test p=0.04). The maximum fracture count to background bone activity ratio averaged 12.7 (range 4.3–27.7) for concordant fractures and 6.3 (range 2.6–9.5) for discordant fractures (t-test p=0.03). It is speculated whether these discordant fractures with less 99Tcm-MDP uptake may represent a less severe injury such as bone bruise.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.