BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 746-748
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/11930472

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kotre, C J
Right arrow Articles by Porter, D J T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kotre, C J
Right arrow Articles by Porter, D J T

Short communication

A printed image quality test phantom for mammography

C J Kotre, PhD 1 and D J T Porter, MSc 2

1 Regional Medical Physics Department, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 6BE and 2 Department of Medical Physics & Bioengineering, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness IV2 3UJ, UK

This communication describes a novel design for a mammographic image quality test phantom, the final design of which was produced as a radiographer weekly quality assurance phantom for breast screening and symptomatic mammography. The phantom is based on low contrast test features which are built up by superimposing sheets of Mylar overhead projector transparency, on which the test features are printed using a standard LaserJet printer. The required radiation contrast at mammographic energies is produced by the approximately 50% by weight component of iron oxide (Fe3O4) present in the toner. An easily replicated design of mammographic image quality phantom based on LaserJet printed test features is described. Approximately 40 of these phantoms were constructed, and these have been used successfully for 5 years in both breast screening and symptomatic mammography. The phantom design offers a performance similar to much more expensive mammographic contrast-detail phantoms, but suffers from the disadvantage that high contrast resolution bar patterns cannot be produced using the standard printing process.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C J Kotre
An investigation of search pattern extent in the threshold contrast detection task
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 79(941): 437 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.