BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 733-736
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/25662922

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vakhtangandze, T
Right arrow Articles by Rees, M R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vakhtangandze, T
Right arrow Articles by Rees, M R

Full Paper

The effect of Butterworth and Metz reconstruction filters on volume and ejection fraction calculations with 99Tcm gated myocardial SPECT

T Vakhtangandze, MD, PhD1,2, D O Hall, PhD3, F V Zananiri, PhD3 and M R Rees, FRCP, FRCR2

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiology and Interventional Diagnostics, Tbilisi, Georgia, 2 Department of Radiology, Bristol University, Bristol and 3 Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, United Bristol Healthcare Trust, Bristol, UK

Correspondence: Michael Rees, Department of Radiology, Bristol General Hospital, Guinea Street, Bristol BS1 6SY, UK

This study was carried out to measure the differences produced by change of reconstruction filter in calculations of left-ventricular end-diastolic volumes, end-systolic volumes, stroke-volumes and left-ventricular ejection-fractions from 99Tcm Sestamibi (Bristol-Myers Squibb) gated myocardial perfusion SPECT studies. 30 patients had gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging at rest. The acquired projections were separately filtered with two filters, a low-pass filter (Butterworth) and an edge-enhancement filter (Metz). Each study was then further processed to determine left-ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, stroke volume and ejection fraction, and to assess defect size. The results for each patient with the two filters were compared. Calculated end-diastolic volumes, end-systolic volumes and left-ventricular ejection fractions, for each filter, were well correlated. Stroke volumes showed worse correlation. The differences between left-ventricular ejection-fractions, end-diastolic volumes and end-systolic volumes were statistically significant. There was no significant difference in stroke volumes. Ejection fractions were inversely correlated with defect size, but change in ejection fraction due to filter was not. End-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were correlated with defect size, but change in volumes due to filter was not. Thus the results for changes produced by choice of filter are not dependent on defect size. Using different reconstruction pre-filters in gated myocardial perfusion SPECT significantly changes the results of calculations of physiological parameters. Each centre should be consistent in the use of filters as this may affect the clinical consequences of the result.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.