BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 596-600
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/32639616

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abdullah, B J J
Right arrow Articles by Benedict, I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abdullah, B J J
Right arrow Articles by Benedict, I

Full Paper

Incidence of upper limb venous thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC)

B J J Abdullah, FRCR 1 N Mohammad, MBBS 1 J V Sangkar, MBBS, MRCP (UK) 1 Y F Abd Aziz, MRad 1 G G Gan, MRCP (UK) 1 K Y Goh, MRCP 1 and I Benedict, MBBS 2

1 Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia, and 2 Sanofi-Synthelabo (Malaysia)

The objective of this study was to prospectively determine the incidence of venous thrombosis (VT) in the upper limbs in patients with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC). We prospectively investigated the incidence of VT in the upper limbs of 26 patients who had PICC inserted. The inclusion criteria were all patients who had a PICC inserted, whilst the exclusion criterion was the inability to perform a venogram (allergies, previous contrast medium reaction and inability of gaining venous access). Both valved and non-valved catheters were evaluated. Prior to removal of the PICC, an upper limb venogram was performed. The number of segments involved with VT were determined. The duration of central venous catheterization was classified as; less than 6 days, between 6 days and 14 days and more than 14 days. VT was confirmed in 38.5% (10/26) of the patients. The majority 85.7% (12/14) were complete occlusive thrombi and the majority of VT only involved one segment. There was no statistical correlation between the site of insertion of the PICC and the location of VT. Neither was there any observed correlation between the occurrence of VT with the patient's history of hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, cardiac insufficiency, smoking or cancer. There was also no statistical correlation with the size of the catheter. In conclusion, PICCs are associated with a significant risk of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEVT).







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.