BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 538-542
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/13870613

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brealey, S D
Right arrow Articles by Scuffham, P A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brealey, S D
Right arrow Articles by Scuffham, P A

Short communication

The effect of introducing radiographer reporting on the availability of reports for Accident and Emergency and General Practitioner examinations: a time-series analysis

S D Brealey, PhD1 and P A Scuffham, PhD2,3

1 York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, 2 York Health Economics Consortium Ltd, University of York, York YO10 5NH, UK and 3 School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

This study explores whether the introduction of selectively trained radiographers reporting Accident and Emergency (A&E) X-ray examinations of the appendicular skeleton affected the availability of reports for A&E and General Practitioner (GP) examinations at a typical district general hospital. This was achieved by analysing monthly data on A&E and GP examinations for 1993–1997 using structural time-series models. Parameters to capture stochastic seasonal effects and stochastic time trends were included in the models. The main outcome measures were changes in the number, proportion and timeliness of A&E and GP examinations reported. Radiographer reporting X-ray examinations requested by A&E was associated with a 12% (p=0.050) increase in the number of A&E examinations reported and a 37% (p≤0.001) decrease in the time taken to report on these examinations. Radiographer reporting of A&E X-ray examinations was also associated with a 14% (p=0.067) decrease in the time taken for GP examinations to be reported. That is, radiographer reporting A&E X-ray examinations allowed an increase in the time available to radiologists to report on examinations requested by GPs. An increase in the proportion of GP examinations reported by radiologists was associated with longer reporting times for A&E examinations. In conclusion, selectively trained radiographers reporting on A&E X-ray examinations significantly improved the availability of reports for A&E and GP examinations.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.