BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 358-361
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/56095273

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beavis, A W
Right arrow Articles by Upadhyay, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beavis, A W
Right arrow Articles by Upadhyay, S

Case report

Re-treatment of a lung tumour using a simple intensity-modulated radiotherapy approach

A W Beavis, PhD1, A Abdel-Hamid, FRCR2 and S Upadhyay, MD2

1 Department of Medical Physics, Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust and Clinical Biosciences Institute, University of Hull, Princess Royal Hospital, Saltshouse Road, Kingston Upon Hull HU8 9HE and 2 Department of Clinical Oncology, Princess Royal Hospital, Saltshouse Road, Kingston Upon Hull HU8 9HE, UK

We present a lung tumour case where, although the proximal spinal cord had already reached its dose tolerance, re-treatment was indicated. Minimization of the cord dose was defined as the main constraint for this case, however additional dose to the heart was considered. A simple (4 field) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment which proved superior to the standard conformal plan was developed using the Computerized Medical Systems (CMS) XiO treatment planning system. The IMRT plan was found to be superior to the conventional conformal plan regarding tumour coverage. It provided 100% saturation of the planning target volume (PTV) by the 95% isodose cloud, whereas the latter only provided 77% coverage. A step and shoot delivery using 10 intensity levels was developed and subsequently delivered for this patient. We considered it to be a routine application of IMRT and an important example of how it can offer benefit in individual and appropriate cases where conventional treatment is inadequate.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.