BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 186-188
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/26372381

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, A F
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, M B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, A F
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, M B

Full Paper

Ultrasound-guided drainage of breast abscesses: results in 151 patients

A F Christensen, MD N Al-Suliman, MD K R Nielsen, MD I Vejborg, MD N Severinsen, MD H Christensen, MD, PhD and M B Nielsen, MD, PhD, DMSc

1 Department of Radiology and 2 Department of Surgery CE, Rigshospitalet, and 3 Department of Neurology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

The aim of this paper is to describe the efficacy of ultrasound-guided drainage of breast abscesses with special attention to the risk of recurrence and the need for surgical treatment in a consecutive patient population. 151 patients, 89 with puerperal and 62 with non-puerperal breast abscesses, were treated with ultrasound-guided drainage, by needle or catheter under local anaesthesia. Follow-up punctures were performed at 2 or 3 day intervals until the clinical condition and ultrasound findings had improved. All patients were treated with oral antibiotics. Mammography was performed to search for underlying cancer. 86 (97%) out of 89 patients with puerperal abscesses and 50 (81%) out of 62 with non-puerperal abscesses recovered after the first round of ultrasound-guided drainage. One patient in each group had recurrence in loco but recovered after further ultrasound-guided drainage. 13 patients, 11 with non-puerperal and two with puerperal abscesses, underwent surgical excision of the abscess cavity or fistulas. Breastfeeding continued and 117 patients were treated as outpatients. The median number of follow up examinations in the ultrasound-department was four (range 1–10) for the group of patients with puerperal abscess and three (range 1–7) in the group of patients with non-puerperal abscess. The corresponding figure for the median number of punctures was for both groups one (range 1–6 and 1–4). There were no reports of newly diagnosed breast cancer in the 2 year follow-up period. This study supports the use of ultrasound-guided drainage in puerperal and non-puerperal breast abscesses. The method is less invasive than traditional surgery and has a high rate of success.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. D. Berna-Serna, J. D. Berna-Mestre, P. J. Galindo, and M. Madrigal
Use of Urokinase in Percutaneous Drainage of Large Breast Abscesses
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2009; 28(4): 449 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
A. Moazzez, R. L. Kelso, S. Towfigh, H. Sohn, T. V. Berne, and R. J. Mason
Breast abscess bacteriologic features in the era of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus epidemics.
Arch Surg, September 1, 2007; 142(9): 881 - 884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.