BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 46-50
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/53924376

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, J
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, J
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J

Full Paper

Effect of the introduction of helical CT on radiation dose in the investigation of pulmonary embolism

J O'Neill, MB, BCh, FRCR, MSc1, J T Murchison, MBChB, FRCR, FRCP2, L Wright, BSc, MSc2 and J Williams, MSc, FIPEM2

1 Radiology Department, St Josephs Hospital, 50 Charlton Ave East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada and 2 Department of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK

Correspondence: John M O'Neill, Radiology Department, St Josephs Hospital, 50 Charlton Ave East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

The aim of this study was to assess the change in patient radiation dose in the radiological investigation of pulmonary embolism since the introduction of helical CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in a large teaching hospital. All radiological investigations performed as an integral part of the imaging protocol in the investigation of clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) were retrospectively reviewed. The protocol for the investigation of PE changed in our institution after the introduction of CTPA. Protocols 1 and 2 were the protocols in place before and after the introduction of CTPA, respectively. An in-depth evaluation was made of the imaging records and radiation dose for 30 consecutive patients investigated for clinically suspected PE in 1995 (protocol 1) and 2002 (protocol 2). Radiation doses were then extrapolated for the total number of patients investigated in each year. The number of radiological investigations performed per patient decreased from a mean of 1.17 in protocol 1 to 1.06 in protocol 2. There was a 44% increase in the total number of patients investigated. The effective dose per patient increased from 1.30 mSv to 1.35 mSv with the introduction of CTPA into the imaging protocol, an increase of only 4%. First line investigations showed a significant decrease in indeterminate examinations from 25.7% to 8.5%. Two different imaging protocols are reviewed with respect to type and number of procedures required for the investigation of PE and the resulting patient effective dose incurred. Results demonstrate an increase in the number of patients being investigated for suspected PE and a small increase in effective dose per patient since the introduction of helical CTPA. Although CTPA in itself incurs a higher effective dose, this is offset by the significant decrease in the number of non-diagnostic and total number of investigations per patient. In addition the ventilation component of lung scintigraphy was not required in protocol 2, thus reducing the dose further. We believe this small increase in effective dose is justified by the decrease in non-diagnostic studies and the reduction in total number of investigations per patient. We hope this paper will serve as a stimulus for the radiology community to examine current protocols in all areas of diagnostic imaging. We stress the importance of assessing new and established imaging investigative protocols to maximize the benefit and reduce any risk to patients.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Roggenland, S. A. Peters, S. P. Lemburg, T. Holland-Letz, V. Nicolas, and C. M. Heyer
CT Angiography in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Impact of Patient Characteristics and Different Venous Lines on Vessel Enhancement and Image Quality
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W351 - W359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. M. Hurwitz, R. E. Reiman, T. T. Yoshizumi, P. C. Goodman, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and C. Lowry
Radiation Dose from Contemporary Cardiothoracic Multidetector CT Protocols with an Anthropomorphic Female Phantom: Implications for Cancer Induction
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 742 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. M. Heyer, P. S. Mohr, S. P. Lemburg, S. A. Peters, and V. Nicolas
Image Quality and Radiation Exposure at Pulmonary CT Angiography with 100- or 120-kVp Protocol: Prospective Randomized Study
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 577 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
H Bolte, C Riede, S Muller-Hulsbeck, S Freitag-Wolf, G Kohl, T Drews, M Heller, and J Bieder
Precision of computer-aided volumetry of artificial small solid pulmonary nodules in ex vivo porcine lungs
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2007; 80(954): 414 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. R. C. Johnson, K. Nikolaou, B. J. Wintersperger, A. Knez, P. Boekstegers, M. F. Reiser, and C. R. Becker
ECG-Gated 64-MDCT Angiography in the Differential Diagnosis of Acute Chest Pain
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 76 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. D. Stein, P. K. Woodard, J. G. Weg, T. W. Wakefield, V. F. Tapson, H. D. Sostman, T. A. Sos, D. A. Quinn, K. V. Leeper Jr, R. D. Hull, et al.
Diagnostic Pathways in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Recommendations of the PIOPED II Investigators
Radiology, January 1, 2007; 242(1): 15 - 21.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Ashraf and O. Ashraf
Helical CT in Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 1200 - 1200.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.