BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 22-29
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/67998962

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xiong, T
Right arrow Articles by Lilford, R J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xiong, T
Right arrow Articles by Lilford, R J

Full Paper

Incidental lesions found on CT colonography: their nature and frequency

T Xiong, MCh1, M Richardson, BSc (Hons), AMINA1, R Woodroffe, MSc1, S Halligan, MD, FRCOG, FRCR2, D Morton3 and R J Lilford, PhD, FRCOG, FRCP1

1 Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Public Health Building, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, 2 Department of Intestinal Imaging, St. Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Northwick Park, London HA1 3UJ and 3 Department of Surgery, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

CT colonography has been used to detect colonic polyps and cancers, but its effect in practice will also be influenced by the frequency with which extracolonic lesions of various types are detected. We performed a systematic review of the types of incidental lesions found on CT colonography. This is necessary to model the benefits and harms of detecting extracolonic lesions. Primary clinical studies of extracolonic findings on CT colonography were identified from electronic databases, scanning reference lists and hand searches of relevant journals and conference proceedings. A data collection proforma was used to collect information on extracolonic findings. 17 discreet studies were identified, involving 3488 patients. In total 40% of patients were recorded to have abnormalities and many had more than one abnormality. Nearly 14% of patients had further investigations and 0.8% were given immediate treatment. Extracolonic cancers were detected in 2.7% (0.9% had N0M0 cancers) and 0.9% had an aortic aneurysm. The number of extracolonic findings was high in all studies. While only a small population were judged "important", the prevalence of serious lesions outside the colon was nevertheless higher than in many other screening programs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. D. Johnson, M.-H. Chen, A. Y. Toledano, J. P. Heiken, A. Dachman, M. D. Kuo, C. O. Menias, B. Siewert, J. I. Cheema, R. G. Obregon, et al.
Accuracy of CT Colonography for Detection of Large Adenomas and Cancers
N. Engl. J. Med., September 18, 2008; 359(12): 1207 - 1217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
S. M. Wolf, F. P. Lawrenz, C. A. Nelson, J. P. Kahn, M. K. Cho, E. W. Clayton, J. G. Fletcher, M. K. Georgieff, D. Hammerschmidt, K. Hudson, et al.
Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
J. Law Med. Ethics, June 1, 2008; 36(2): 219 - 248.
[PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
H. Siddiki, J. G. Fletcher, B. McFarland, N. Dajani, N. Orme, B. Koenig, M. Strobel, and S. M. Wolf
Incidental Findings in CT Colonography: Literature Review and Survey of Current Research Practice.
J. Law Med. Ethics, June 1, 2008; 36(2): 320 - 331.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. H. Fletcher and M. Pignone
Extracolonic Findings With Computed Tomographic Colonography: Asset or Liability?
Arch Intern Med, April 14, 2008; 168(7): 685 - 686.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. Hassan, P. Pickhardt, A. Laghi, D. Kim, A. Zullo, F. Iafrate, L. Di Giulio, and S. Morini
Computed Tomographic Colonography to Screen for Colorectal Cancer, Extracolonic Cancer, and Aortic Aneurysm: Model Simulation With Cost-effectiveness Analysis
Arch Intern Med, April 14, 2008; 168(7): 696 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
D. Burling, J. E East, and S. A Taylor
Investigating rectal bleeding
BMJ, December 15, 2007; 335(7632): 1260 - 1262.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. J. M. Tolan, E. M. Armstrong, and A. H. Chapman
Replacing Barium Enema with CT Colonography in Patients Older Than 70 Years: The Importance of Detecting Extracolonic Abnormalities
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1104 - 1111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. F. Glockner
Incidental Findings on Renal MR Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 693 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
T Xiong, K McEvoy, D G Morton, S Halligan, and R J Lilford
Resources and costs associated with incidental extracolonic findings from CT colonogaphy: a study in a symptomatic population
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2006; 79(948): 948 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Davila, C. D. Johnson, T. R. Behrenbeck, T. L. Hoskin, and W. S. Harmsen
Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk Status at CT Colonography.
Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 110 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
BJR Review of the Year - 2005.
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2006; 79(939): 183 - 187.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. Schoder, H. W.D. Yeung, and S. M. Larson
CT in PET/CT: Essential Features of Interpretation
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1249 - 1251.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.