BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 991-999
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/36674326

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riordan, R D
Right arrow Articles by Cook, P G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riordan, R D
Right arrow Articles by Cook, P G

Full Paper

Pineapple juice as a negative oral contrast agent in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a preliminary evaluation

R D Riordan, MBBS, MRCP, FRCR, M Khonsari, MBChB, MRCP, FRCR, J Jeffries, DCR, PgCert, G F Maskell, MBBS, MRCP, FRCR and P G Cook, BSc, MBChB, FRCR

Department of Radiology, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall TR1 3LJ, UK

Correspondence: Dr Philip Cook

The quality of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) images is frequently degraded by high signal from the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study is to evaluate pineapple juice (PJ) as an oral negative contrast agent in MRCP. Preliminary in vitro evaluation demonstrated that PJ shortened T2 relaxation time and hence decreased T2 signal intensity on a standard MRCP sequence to a similar degree to a commercially available negative contrast agent (ferumoxsil). Electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry assay demonstrated a high manganese concentration in PJ of 2.76 mg dl–1, which is likely to be responsible for its T2 imaging properties. MRCP was subsequently performed in 10 healthy volunteers, before and at 15 min and 30 min following ingestion of 400 ml of PJ. Images were assessed blindly by two Consultant Radiologists using a standard grading technique based on contrast effect (degree of suppression of bowel signal), and image effect (diagnostic quality). There were statistically significant improvements in contrast and image effect between pre and post PJ images. There was particularly significant improvement in visualization of the pancreatic duct, but no significant difference between 15 min and 30 min post PJ images. Visualization of the ampulla, common bile duct, common hepatic and central intrahepatic ducts were also significantly improved at 15 min following PJ. Our results demonstrate that PJ, may be used as an alternative to commercially available negative oral contrast agent in MRCP.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Zhang, G. M. Israel, E. M. Hecht, G. A. Krinsky, J. S. Babb, and V. S. Lee
Isotropic 3D T2-Weighted MR Cholangiopancreatography with Parallel Imaging: Feasibility Study.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1564 - 1570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.