BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 950-952
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/21117919

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Court, L
Right arrow Articles by Yamazaki, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Court, L
Right arrow Articles by Yamazaki, T

Short communication

Technical note: a comparison of antiscatter grids for digital radiography

L Court, PhD and T Yamazaki, BS

DR System Development Division, Canon Inc., Utsunomiya, Japan

Correspondence: Tatsuya Yamazaki, DR Systems Development Division, Canon Inc., 20-2 Kiyohara Kogyo-Danchi, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan, Zip 321-3292

The use of digital radiography (DR) systems offers a number of advantages over film–screen detectors. One potential disadvantage, however, is that some fixed DR systems do not allow the user to change the antiscatter grid to suit the imaging task. Instead, the user must choose the grid at the time of purchase. Six grids, which are offered as installation options for one commercial fixed-room DR system, were experimentally evaluated, using a range of scatter conditions and tube voltages. In addition, three grids, which are available with a portable DR system in which the user can change the grid to suit the imaging task, were also evaluated. The grids were compared using the primary transmission, scatter fraction, and calculated signal-to-noise improvement factor (SIF). It was found that the grids with low atomic number interspace and cover material had an SIF up to 15% higher than did the grids with aluminium interspace and cover material; the grid with a grid ratio of 12:1 had the highest SIF for all tube voltages and scatter conditions tested here. This 12:1 grid probably represents a good general-purpose non-removable grid in DR.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
B. J. Irving, G. J. Maree, E. R. Hering, and T. S. Douglas
Radiation dose from a linear slit scanning X-ray machine with full-body imaging capabilities
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, July 1, 2008; 130(4): 482 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.