BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 931-933
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/62185486

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, C
Right arrow Articles by O'Reilly, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, C
Right arrow Articles by O'Reilly, G

Full Paper

Exposure variations under error conditions in automatic exposure controlled film–screen projection radiography

C Walsh, BA, MSc, A Larkin, BSc, S Dennan, BRad, MSc and G O'Reilly, MSc, PhD

St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland

Improper automatic exposure control (AEC) termination may result in high overexposures on some radiographic systems. Under AEC, X-ray factors are adjusted automatically to compensate for differences in patient thickness and density. In radiography, AEC is implemented using ionization chambers placed in the film bucky. In this study we deliberately chose incorrect set-up conditions and assessed the response of the AEC system. Two types of incorrect set-up were studied: (1) incorrect selection of bucky radiation detector and (2) simulated misalignment between the X-ray field and light field. The systems tested varied in age from 1 year to in excess of 10 years. In the first test, overexposures of 90 mGy were recorded. Two systems did not meet EC guidelines for improper AEC termination. The second test, misalignment of the X-ray field, was observed to affect the exposure delivered by approximately ±22%. The maximum dose increase observed, with a chest phantom in the beam, was 165 µGy. Misalignments also resulted in reduced exposures, which may impact on image quality.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C J Martin
A survey of incidents in radiology and nuclear medicine in the West of Scotland
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(934): 913 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.