BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 864-868
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/99143061

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, C J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, C J

Full Paper

A review of factors affecting patient doses for barium enemas and meals

C J Martin, PhD, FIPEM, FIOP

Health Physics, Department of Clinical Physics & Bio-Engineering, West House, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, Glasgow G12 0XH, UK

A study of patient doses for barium enema and meal examinations has been carried out for hospitals in the West of Scotland to assess the impact of dose reduction facilities on new X-ray equipment. Dose–area product (DAP) information has been collected on examinations for groups of patients at 20 hospitals and results reviewed together with data on equipment performance measurements. Median DAPs for barium enemas and meals were 15.7 Gy cm2 and 4.8 Gy cm2, respectively, and effective doses estimated from the results are 3.5±0.7 mSv and 1.5±0.5 mSv, respectively. These doses are lower than those reported in earlier studies and in previous surveys in the West of Scotland. The reduction in dose is linked primarily to the low dose facilities available on newer X-ray equipment, such as low dose pulsed fluoroscopy, digital imaging facilities and use of copper filtration. Use of the image intensifier for decubitus images on C-arm units employed for barium enemas also gives a significantly lower dose. Equipment with copper filtration had the lowest doses. The reduction in effective dose will be significantly less than the reduction in DAP for units in which a copper filter is included and the adoption of lower diagnostic reference levels is proposed for units with this facility. It is important that the operators are aware of the low dose imaging options on their equipment in order that techniques can be fully optimized.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
Y HIROFUJI, T AOYAMA, S KOYAMA, C KAWAURA, and K FUJII
Evaluation of patient dose for barium enemas and CT colonography in Japan
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2009; 82(975): 219 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, I. Yamaguchi, M. Yamagishi, A. Watanabe, T. Abe, and I. Kobayashi
Effective Dose during Abdominal Three-dimensional Imaging with a Flat-Panel Detector Angiography System
Radiology, February 1, 2009; 250(2): 545 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
C. J. Martin
RADIATION DOSIMETRY FOR DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL EXPOSURES
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 28, 2008; (2008) ncm495v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. A. Jaffe, A. M. Gaca, S. Delaney, T. T. Yoshizumi, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and D. P. Frush
Radiation Doses from Small-Bowel Follow-Through and Abdominopelvic MDCT in Crohn's Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1015 - 1022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. J. M. Tolan, E. M. Armstrong, and A. H. Chapman
Replacing Barium Enema with CT Colonography in Patients Older Than 70 Years: The Importance of Detecting Extracolonic Abnormalities
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1104 - 1111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
radtechHome page
W. M. McCartney
Radiation Dose During Barium Enema
Radiol. Technol., September 1, 2007; 79(1): 91 - 93.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C J Martin
Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures?
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2007; 80(956): 639 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
BJR Review of the Year - 2004
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2005; 78(927): 181 - 185.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.