BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 858-863
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/21484847

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by George, J
Right arrow Articles by Frain, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by George, J
Right arrow Articles by Frain, G

Full Paper

Patient dose optimization in plain radiography based on standard exposure factors

J George, MSc 1 J P Eatough, PhD 1 P J Mountford, PhD 1 C J Koller, MSc 1 J Oxtoby, FRCR 2 and G Frain, MMath 1

1 Medical Physics Directorate and 2 Imaging Directorate, University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust, Princes Road, Hartshill, Stoke on Trent ST4 7LN, UK

A computational technique for assessing patient dose in plain radiography is described allowing a large number of examinations to be assessed and enabling dose optimization to be promoted. Entrance surface dose (ESD) was calculated for more than 1500 standard exposure settings in an initial dose assessment. Validation of the technique showed good agreement with thermoluminescent dosimetry and showed broad agreement between the standard exposures and the exposure settings used in practice. The dose assessment was repeated 18 months later using the same techniques for almost 2000 standard exposure settings. In both cases, calculated doses showed good compliance with national diagnostic reference levels where available. Suggested investigation levels were established and set at twice the mean dose for each of 47 examinations. Radiology departments were encouraged to review and optimize doses exceeding these levels. The computed mean ESD in the review study was less than the corresponding value in the initial study in 37 of the 47 examinations. The dose reduction was attributable partly to equipment replacement, but primarily to optimization of exposure settings. The technique employed here provides a valid and cost effective method of complying with statutory requirements for the assessment of representative patient dose and is useful in assisting the ongoing process of dose optimization.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
H. Liu, W. Zhuo, B. Chen, Y. Yi, and D. Li
Patient doses in different projections of conventional diagnostic X-ray examinations
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2008; 132(3): 334 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
V Tsapaki, I A Tsalafoutas, I Chinofoti, A Karageorgi, E Carinou, V Kamenopoulou, E N Yakoumakis, and E D Koulentianos
Radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations: a comparison between two methods
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2007; 80(950): 107 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
B M Moores
Radiation dose measurement and optimization
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2005; 78(933): 866 - 868.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.