This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Morán, L M Articles by Morán, P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Morán, L M Articles by Morán, P

Image quality and dose evaluation in spiral chest CT examinations of patients with lung carcinoma

¹ Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital de El Escorial, ² Departamento de Radiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, ³ Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, ⁴ Departamento de Estadística e I. O., Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, ⁵ Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Doce de Octubre, ⁶ Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital del Aire, ⁷ Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital de Móstoles and ⁸ Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario La Paz

A study was undertaken to assess the quality of general chest CT examinations for indication of lung carcinoma according to the criteria proposed in the European Commission (EC) Guidelines, and to investigate their usefulness in the optimization of this practice. The criteria were evaluated for a sample of 100 examinations from five radiology departments in the Madrid area featuring single slice helical CT scanners with special emphasis on radiation dose and image quality. To determine the degree of compliance with the image criteria considered, the examinations were independently evaluated twice by five radiologists from the participating centres. A subsequent selection of the observers was made according to the consistency and independence of their readings. Dose measurements carried out in parallel supplied data to estimate the values of the CT dose indices (CTDI), dose–length product (DLP) and effective dose (E). The results show good compliance with the image criteria used – between 93% and 98% on average at the different sites, with variable degrees of internal deviation. 10 out of a total of 16 criteria proposed in the EC guidelines were met by practically all the examinations in the sample. The average weighted CTDI (CTDI_w) values per site were in the range of 13–19 mGy; those of DLP were between 263 mGy cm and 577 mGy cm, and those of effective dose between 4 mSv and 9 mSv. The highest mean DLP value was below but close to the reference value proposed in the EC Document (650 mGy cm). In general, a weak correlation or no correlation at all was found between image quality scores and patient dose (DLP).