BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 775-776
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/66388556

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dawes, T J W
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, A K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dawes, T J W
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, A K

Short communication

Training improves medical student performance in image interpretation

T J W Dawes, MA, MB, BChir 1 S L Vowler, MSc 2 C M C Allen, MD, FRCP 1 and A K Dixon, MD, FRCP, FRCR, FMedSci 3

1 School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's NHS Trust, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, 2 The Centre for Applied Medical Statistics, University Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR and 3 Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Box 219, Addenbrooke's NHS Trust, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK

Correspondence: Dr T J W Dawes, The Old Farm, Long Sutton, Hook, Hampshire RG29 1SX, UK

The aim of this study was to objectively quantify the effects of radiological teaching on student performance in interpreting radiological images, and to establish whether training location affects performance. 114 clinical students were asked to anonymously interpret radiological cases before and after 26 weeks clinical training. Improvements were assessed by comparing performance on the median question in each assessment using the Kruskal-Wallis analysis. Variations according to different placements were assessed by the Mann-Whitney U-test. There was a highly significant (p<0.001) improvement in the performance of the group with training. The proportion of correct answers to the median question improved from 8% to 43%. Differences between training placements were non-significant. Our study suggests that radiology teaching significantly improves student performance. Future work should look to define the contribution of "clinical exposure" towards this improvement, as well as the various teaching methods employed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
jvmeHome page
C.R. Lamb, D.U. Pfeiffer, and P. Mantis
Errors in Radiographic Interpretation Made by Veterinary Students
J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2007; 34(2): 157 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.