BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 751-758
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/16707499

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, D S
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, D S
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D

Full Paper

Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems

D S Evans, MSc A Mackenzie, MSc C P Lawinski, MPhil and D Smith, MSc

KCARE (King's Centre for the Assessment of Radiological Equipment), King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK

Threshold contrast detail detectability (TCDD) test objects are a commonly used tool to assess image quality of imaging systems. FAXIL (The Facility for the Assessment of X-ray imaging, Leeds) produced updated standard TCDD curves, for fluoroscopy systems in good adjustment, in 1992. Fluoroscopy curves can be corrected to account for the effect of image intensifier input air kerma rate and field size. This paper presents updated TCDD curves for fluoroscopy and new curves for digital acquisition. The results for digital acquisition suggest that the TCDD curves should not be corrected for input air kerma, as the quantum noise is not dominant and system noise is significant. These curves will prove useful for accepting new equipment, to give an indication of the expected image quality for a new image intensifier system.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. J. Tapiovaara
Review of relationships between physical measurements and user evaluation of image quality
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 244 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A Mackenzie
Author's reply
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2005; 78(929): 470 - 470.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C J Kotre and N W Marshall
Threshold-contrast detectability curves for digital acquisition
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2005; 78(929): 469 - 470.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.