BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 662-665
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/48307881

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groves, A M
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, A K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groves, A M
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, A K

Full Paper

16-detector multislice CT: dosimetry estimation by TLD measurement compared with Monte Carlo simulation

A M Groves, BSc, MRCP, FRCR1, K E Owen, MPhys2, H M Courtney, BSc, PGC, DCR1, S J Yates, MSci, MSc2, K E Goldstone, BSc, MSc, FIPEM2, G M Blake, PhD3 and A K Dixon, MD, FRCP, FRCR1

Departments of 1 Radiology and 2 Medical Physics, Addenbrooke's Hospital NHS Trust and the University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ and 3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guys Hospital, St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RT, UK

Computer simulations are widely used to estimate effective doses from CT examinations. The raw data often used in their estimations were obtained some years ago and made certain assumptions regarding CT unit design. At that time multidetector CT units were unavailable. Changes in design will limit the accuracy of computer simulated dosimetry on these machines. We therefore estimated CT dose on a 16-detector unit directly using thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) and an anthropomorphic phantom. We found that the dose measured directly was 18% higher than the computer simulated dosimetry, in keeping with the previously recognised underestimation by computer simulation techniques compared with TLD measurements.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, L. M. Hurwitz, and P. C. Goodman
Computing Effective Doses from Dose-Length Product in CT
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 321 - 322.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. M. Hurwitz, R. E. Reiman, T. T. Yoshizumi, P. C. Goodman, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and C. Lowry
Radiation Dose from Contemporary Cardiothoracic Multidetector CT Protocols with an Anthropomorphic Female Phantom: Implications for Cancer Induction
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 742 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. J. Brenner and E. J. Hall
Computed Tomography -- An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure
N. Engl. J. Med., November 29, 2007; 357(22): 2277 - 2284.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. A. Jaffe, A. M. Gaca, S. Delaney, T. T. Yoshizumi, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and D. P. Frush
Radiation Doses from Small-Bowel Follow-Through and Abdominopelvic MDCT in Crohn's Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1015 - 1022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Rothkamm, S. Balroop, J. Shekhdar, P. Fernie, and V. Goh
Leukocyte DNA Damage after Multi-Detector Row CT: A Quantitative Biomarker of Low-Level Radiation Exposure
Radiology, January 1, 2007; 242(1): 244 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. H. Moore, M. Bonvento, and R. Olivieri-Fitt
Comparison of MDCT radiation dose: a phantom study.
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): W498 - W502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. M. Groves, S. J. Yates, T. Win, I. Kayani, F. A. Gallagher, R. Syed, J. Bomanji, and P. J. Ell
CT Pulmonary Angiography versus Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy in Pregnancy: Implications from a UK Survey of Doctors' Knowledge of Radiation Exposure
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 765 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.