BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 633-640
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/31556748

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fung, K T T
Right arrow Articles by Burroughs, A K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fung, K T T
Right arrow Articles by Burroughs, A K

Full Paper

Systematic review of radiological imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients

K T T Fung, MRCP 1 F T W Li, MRCP 1 M L Raimondo, MD 1 D Maudgil, FRCR 2 A Mancuso, MD 1 J M Tibballs, FRCR 2 A A Watkinson, FRCR 2 D Patch, FRCP 1 and A K Burroughs, FRCP 1

1 Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Medicine, The Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG and 2 Department of Radiology, The Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK

Correspondence: Prof. A K Burroughs

We systematically reviewed the evidence for determining the best radiological imaging for characterizing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients in 997 articles between 1995 and 2001. We selected only prospective and retrospective cohorts of patients, excluding both case reports and studies without separate data on HCC. Only 29 studies, comprising 918 patients, fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 10 used the explanted liver as the reference standard of diagnosis. All except one, either found no statistically significant difference between imaging modalities or had no direct comparison of sensitivity between different modalities of imaging; 16 studies evaluated HCC among cirrhotic patients and had biopsy or imaging as the reference standard for diagnosis. However, no one imaging technique was shown to be superior. In two studies, data of a HCC subgroup was derived from the studies evaluating different kinds of focal hepatic lesions. No conclusion could be drawn because of the small sample size. One study addressed the issue of therapeutic impact. The evidence for choosing the best modality of imaging for characterizing HCC in cirrhotic patients is inadequate. Large multicentre studies with defined reference standards for diagnosis, and studies evaluating therapeutic impact are needed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
F. Eckel, K. Herrmann, S. Schmidt, C. Hillerer, H. A. Wieder, B.-J. Krause, T. Schuster, R. Langer, H.-J. Wester, R. M. Schmid, et al.
Imaging of Proliferation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with the In Vivo Marker 18F-Fluorothymidine
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2009; 50(9): 1441 - 1447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. Loubeyre
Moving Field of Oncologic Diagnosis: Another Reason for Going Beyond the Picture
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1368 - 1369.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P J A Robinson
EBM and the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2005; 78(928): 370 - 371.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A K Burroughs, K T T Fung, F T W Li, M L Raimondo, D Maudgil, A Mancuso, J M Tibballs, A A Watkinson, and D Patch
Authors' reply
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2005; 78(928): 371 - 372.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.