BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 557-561
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/67235257

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waddington, S P
Right arrow Articles by McKenzie, A L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waddington, S P
Right arrow Articles by McKenzie, A L

Full Paper

Assessment of effective dose from concomitant exposures required in verification of the target volume in radiotherapy

S P Waddington, MSc1 and A L McKenzie, DSc2

1 Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of West of England, Bristol BS16 1DD and 2 Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Horfield Road, Bristol BS2 8ED, UK

The requirement of the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulation 2000 [IR(ME)R] of justifying all exposures to ionizing radiation includes those from radiotherapy double exposure portal images resulting in exposure to normal tissues outside the treatment volume. Typical effective doses were calculated for a range of common sites using CT data to outline those parts of specific organs subject to concomitant radiation and generate dose–volume histograms. The product of the mean dose and the relative probability of inducing a fatal cancer in specific organs was used to determine a representative total effective dose in mSv per monitor unit for each site. A table of representative effective doses, ranging from 0.32 mSv to 2.56 mSv per monitor unit, was produced, which may be used to monitor cumulative effective doses of individual patients from double exposure portal images, in addition to those received from localization procedures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
J. Gu, B. Bednarz, X. G. Xu, and S. B. Jiang
Assessment of patient organ doses and effective doses using the VIP-Man adult male phantom for selected cone-beam CT imaging procedures during image guided radiation therapy
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2008; 131(4): 431 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
R M Harrison, M Wilkinson, D J Rawlings, and M Moore
Doses to critical organs following radiotherapy and concomitant imaging of the larynx and breast
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 80(960): 989 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C J Moore, A Amer, T Marchant, J R Sykes, J Davies, J Stratford, C McCarthy, C MacBain, A Henry, P Price, et al.
Developments in and experience of kilovoltage X-ray cone beam image-guided radiotherapy
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 79(Special_Issue_1): S66 - S78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
R M Harrison, M Wilkinson, A Shemilt, D J Rawlings, M Moore, and A R Lecomber
Organ doses from prostate radiotherapy and associated concomitant exposures.
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2006; 79(942): 487 - 496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J Kinsman and P Humphrey
Portal imaging
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2005; 78(932): 681 - 682.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
BJR Review of the Year - 2004
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2005; 78(927): 181 - 185.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E G A Aird
Second cancer risk, concomitant exposures and IRMER(2000)
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2004; 77(924): 983 - 985.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.