BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 493-498
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/82394256
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNair, H A
Right arrow Articles by Balyckyi, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McNair, H A
Right arrow Articles by Balyckyi, J

Full Paper

Clinical implementation of dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy: radiographers' perspectives

H A McNair, MSc, BSc, DCR(T) 1 G Francis, MSc, BSc, TDCR 2 and J Balyckyi, HDCR(T), MBA 1

1 Radiotherapy Department, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT and 2 Kingston University & St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK

The ability of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to sculpt the dose distribution closely around the tumour volume has the potential to have a major impact on radiotherapy clinical practice. However, dynamic IMRT treatment delivery differs from that of conventional treatment because of the constantly moving multileaf collimators (MLCs) and higher monitor units (MUs) required. The implementation of new technology can be affected by the users response. Radiographers' attitudes regarding technology and their perceptions of the clinical implementation of IMRT were explored using a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews. 16 radiographers were interviewed and data was analysed using a framework analysis to identify themes and categories. The majority of radiographers (12/16) demonstrated positive attitudes regarding technology. The introduction of IMRT was seen to be stimulating and motivating. Negative aspects were associated with increased stress from learning new skills and the additional pressure of the increased workload. Although there were contradictory views regarding the effect of the increased use of technology on the patient–radiographer relationship, technological skills and patient care were not found to be mutually exclusive. Radiographers' perceptions regarding the clinical implementation of IMRT appeared to be influenced by their mainly positive attitudes regarding technology. With the current problems of recruitment and retention of radiographers, full exploitation of modern technology could be used to improve job satisfaction. However, careful integration is required to balance training needs with service demands.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
BJR Review of the Year - 2004
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2005; 78(927): 181 - 185.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.