BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 472-478
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/21927258

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yates, S J
Right arrow Articles by Goldstone, K E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yates, S J
Right arrow Articles by Goldstone, K E

Full Paper

Effect of multislice scanners on patient dose from routine CT examinations in East Anglia

S J Yates, MSc L C Pike, BSc and K E Goldstone, MSc, FIPEM

East Anglian Regional Radiation Protection Service, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK

As part of the dose optimization process, the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000 include requirements relating to the assessment of patient dose, and the setting and subsequent review of diagnostic reference levels. In East Anglia, audits of effective dose in CT have been carried out in 1996, 1999 and 2002. In the 2002 audit, nine of the 14 scanners assessed had been replaced since the previous audit. Eight of the new scanners were multislice scanners, acquiring up to 16 slices in a single rotation. The objective of the 2002 audit was to investigate the effect of the introduction of these multislice scanners on patient doses from routine CT examinations. Exposure parameters were collected for 10 different types of routine CT examination. In excess of 550 sets of patient data were obtained. For each of these, effective doses were calculated using the results of Monte Carlo simulations published by the National Radiological Protection Board. Averaged across all 10 examinations, regional mean effective doses are 34% higher than in 1999. The multislice scanners in the region give, on average, 35% more effective dose than the single-slice scanners. The effect of collimation in multislice scanners makes these effective dose differences most notable for examinations that use narrow slice widths. Further optimization of exposures on multislice scanners has the potential to reduce the differences observed between single-slice and multislice doses. However, when taken in combination with the increased use of CT in many hospitals, the effective dose increases observed are likely to result in a significant increase in the already substantial collective radiation dose from CT.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
R. S. Livingstone and P. M. Dinakaran
Regional survey of CT dose indices in India
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2009; 136(3): 222 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J Rixe, G Conradi, A Rolf, A Schmermund, A Magedanz, D Erkapic, A Deetjen, C W Hamm, and T Dill
Radiation dose exposure of computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison of dual-source, 16-slice and 64-slice CT
Heart, August 15, 2009; 95(16): 1337 - 1342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
O J ARTHURS, S J YATES, P A K SET, D A GIBBONS, and A K DIXON
Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose in adolescent thoracic imaging: 64-slice is preferable to 16-slice multislice CT
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2009; 82(974): 157 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J A SOYE and A PATERSON
A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionals in Northern Ireland
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2008; 81(969): 725 - 729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. M. Kwee and T. C. Kwee
Imaging in Local Staging of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review
J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2007; 25(15): 2107 - 2116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P C Shrimpton, M C Hillier, M A Lewis, and M Dunn
National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2006; 79(948): 968 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. N. Primak, C. H. McCollough, M. R. Bruesewitz, J. Zhang, and J. G. Fletcher
Relationship between Noise, Dose, and Pitch in Cardiac Multi-Detector Row CT
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1785 - 1794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M A Lewis and S Edyvean
Patient dose reduction in CT
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(934): 880 - 883.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
S. J. Golding
Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT): the dose challenge of the new revolution
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 303 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
BJR Review of the Year - 2004
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2005; 78(927): 181 - 185.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.