BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 465-471
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/18928981

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wade, C
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, P C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wade, C
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, P C

Full Paper

Assessment of monitor conditions for the display of radiological diagnostic images and ambient lighting

C Wade, BSc and P C Brennan, PhD

University College Dublin, School of Diagnostic Imaging, Herbert Avenue, Dublin 4, Ireland

Diagnostic efficacy is related to viewing conditions. An increasing number of radiology departments are using workstations for reporting and it was the aim of this study to assess monitor performance and ambient lighting in areas allocated to soft-copy reporting and review. The study was performed in 4 Dublin hospitals and 20 monitors were examined. Using a Society of Motion Pictures and Television Engineers' (SMPTE) test pattern, maximum luminance, spatial uniformity of luminance, temporal luminance stability, brightness and contrast resolution (gamma), geometry and ambient lighting was assessed. The results demonstrated that although temporal luminance stability and spatial uniformity appeared to be at acceptable levels, maximum luminance and gamma value variations were noted, with maximum luminance and geometry values often not complying with published guidelines. Cleaning the monitor face had no impact. 90% of viewing areas had acceptable ambient lighting levels. The data presented demonstrate that monitors examined were not operating at optimal levels for all performance parameters and inclusion of regular assessments of monitors should be part of an imaging department's ongoing quality assurance programme.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N Buls, W Shabana, P Verbeek, P Pevenage, and J De Mey
Influence of display quality on radiologists' performance in the detection of lung nodules on radiographs
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2007; 80(957): 738 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D P Thompson, C J Koller, and J P Eatough
Practical assessment of the display performance of radiology workstations
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2007; 80(952): 256 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. C. Brennan, M. McEntee, M. Evanoff, P. Phillips, W. T. O'Connor, and D. J. Manning
Ambient Lighting: Effect of Illumination on Soft-Copy Viewing of Radiographs of the Wrist
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): W177 - W180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.