BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 414-419
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/51786246

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilks, R J
Right arrow Articles by Donovan, E M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilks, R J
Right arrow Articles by Donovan, E M

Full Paper

Comparison of a lung fitting algorithm with CT data for tangential fields in radiotherapy of the breast

R J Wilks, BSc, PhD 1 P J Childs, BSc, MSc 2 and E M Donovan, BSc, MSc 2

1 Medical Physics Department, Torbay Hospital, Newton Road, Torquay, Devon TQ2 7AA and 2 Medical Physics Department, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK

Correspondence: Dr R Wilks, Burraton Bungalow, Broadclyst, Exeter, Devon EX5 3DB, UK

A method of estimating the shape and position of the lung in tangential breast fields is presented for patients who have not been CT scanned. Using the Osiris system, the external contour is obtained optically, and an estimated lung structure superimposed on the transverse outlines based on the measured lung depth in the tangential fields and an analysis of the typical lung shapes obtained from CT images. The accuracy of this fit was determined by comparison with a set of 64 CT images imported into the Osiris system. Dose distributions were calculated by two treatment planning systems: ADAC Pinnacle and GE Target2. The computed dose distributions for 6 MV photons were compared against measured doses in a specialized breast phantom. For the worst case of lung fit compared with CT, the dosimetric error (based upon ADAC Pinnacle calculations) was 2.0% in the shadow of the lung. For the complete patient data set, the relative dose errors to these points were reduced from a mean value of 8.4% and standard deviation (SD)=1.8% (no lung correction) to a mean of 0.2% and SD=1.0% (lung correction using fitted lung). It was also found that for every 1 cm of lung path length the dose to the breast along that path length increased by approximately 1%. The results of these investigations indicated that the lung fit model was satisfactory for routine clinical use, so that good dosimetric results can be obtained using lung correction without the need for CT imaging.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E M DONOVAN, J R YARNOLD, E J ADAMS, A MORGAN, A P J WARRINGTON, and P M EVANS
An investigation into methods of IMRT planning applied to breast radiotherapy
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2008; 81(964): 311 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.