BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 372-376
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/83624598

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLean, R G
Right arrow Articles by Elison, B S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLean, R G
Right arrow Articles by Elison, B S

Full Paper

Comparison of new clinical and scintigraphic algorithms for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

R G McLean, MD, FRACP, M Carolan, BSc, C Bui, MB, BS, FRACP, O Arvela, MB, BS, FRACP, J C Ford, MB, BS, FRACP, M Chew, MB, BS, FRACP, S Wadhwa, MB, BS, FRACP and B S Elison, MB, BS, FRACP

Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong NSW 2500, Australia

Since the publication of the modified Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) criteria for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), new clinical and scintigraphic diagnostic algorithms (the McMaster clinical criteria, the PisaPED simplified scintigraphic grading and the Miettinen logistic regression analysis) have been reported although the results have not been reproduced in other sites. Ventilation–perfusion lung scintigraphy was performed in 238 consecutive patients with a provisional diagnosis of PE. Scans were reported as normal/very low, low, intermediate or high probability for PE using standardized criteria. Each patient received a clinical grading of probability of PE as low, moderate or high using the McMaster clinical criteria. Using the PisaPED criteria (an alternate simplified scintigraphic grading system using the perfusion scan alone) each scan was also graded as normal/near normal, abnormal but not PE, or abnormal and PE. Using the logistic regression algorithm of Miettinen each scan received a numerical probability of PE. Frequencies for differing levels of probability of PE varied widely between the various algorithms. Cross tabulations revealed correlation of the standardized criteria with the Miettinen grading but not with the McMaster or the PisaPED gradings. We were unable to reproduce similar results using the McMaster clinical grading or the PisaPED simplified scintigraphic grading although the Miettinen logistic regression formula gave comparable results. New algorithms are not automatically transferable to new environments.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
BJR Review of the Year - 2004
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2005; 78(927): 181 - 185.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.