BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 231-235
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/28883951

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manning, D J
Right arrow Articles by Donovan, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manning, D J
Right arrow Articles by Donovan, T

Short communication

Detection or decision errors? Missed lung cancer from the posteroanterior chest radiograph

D J Manning, PhD, FInstP S C Ethell, BSc and T Donovan, MSc

Department of Radiography and Imaging Sciences, St Martin's College, Lancaster LA1 3JD, UK

A test bank of verified chest radiographs was compiled for visual search experiments to investigate radiology performance in the detection of early lung cancer. A measure of the physical characteristics of the lesions was derived to determine the conspicuity ({chi}) of the nodules and to investigate possible causes of failed detection. Observer performance was measured by alternate free response operating characteristic (AFROC) methodology and was supplemented with visual search recording. Correlation of AFROC scores and the {chi} values was poor but inspection of the visual search recordings showed that most nodules were fixated. Fixations on missed lesions produced average dwell times greater than three times the minimum duration thought to be associated with detection. We conclude that the majority of errors were failures of decision rather than detection and comment on the implications of this for strategies to improve diagnostic effectiveness.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
H. Singh, S. Sethi, M. Raber, and L. A. Petersen
Errors in Cancer Diagnosis: Current Understanding and Future Directions
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2007; 25(31): 5009 - 5018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
T Donovan and D J Manning
The radiology task: Bayesian theory and perception
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2007; 80(954): 389 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
E G Dallas, R A Clement, and D S I Taylor
Diagnosis from fundus photographs
Br J Ophthalmol, May 1, 2007; 91(5): 608 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
R S Saunders and E Samei
Improving mammographic decision accuracy by incorporating observer ratings with interpretation time
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2006; 79(Special_Issue_2): S117 - S122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D Manning, S C Barker-Mill, T Donovan, and T Crawford
Time-dependent observer errors in pulmonary nodule detection.
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2006; 79(940): 342 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D J Manning, A Gale, and E A Krupinski
Perception research in medical imaging
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2005; 78(932): 683 - 685.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
BJR Review of the Year - 2004
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2005; 78(927): 181 - 185.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.