BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 204-215
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/22642890

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tingberg, A
Right arrow Articles by Zankl, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tingberg, A
Right arrow Articles by Zankl, M

Full Paper

Influence of the characteristic curve on the clinical image quality of lumbar spine and chest radiographs

A Tingberg, PhD 1 C Herrmann, PhD 2 B Lanhede, MSc 3 A Almén, PhD 1 M Sandborg, PhD 4 G McVey, BSc, MSc 5 S Mattsson, PhD 1 W Panzer, MSc 2 J Besjakov, PhD, MD 6 L G Månsson, PhD 3 S Kheddache, PhD, MD 7 G Alm Carlsson, PhD 4 D R Dance, PhD 5 U Tylén, PhD, MD 7 and M Zankl, MSc 2

1 Department of Radiation Physics, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden, 2 GSF-National Research Centre for Environment and Health, D-857 64 Neuherberg, Germany, 3 Department of Radiation Physics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden, 4 Department of Radiation Physics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden, 5 Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK, 6 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden and 7 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden

The "European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images" do not address the choice of the film characteristic (H&D) curve, which is an important parameter for the description of a radiographic screen–film system. The image contrast of clinical lumbar spine and chest radiographs was altered by digital image processing techniques, simulating images with different H&D curves, both steeper and flatter than the original. The manipulated images were printed on film for evaluation. Seven experienced radiologists evaluated the clinical image quality by analysing the fulfilment of the European Image Criteria (ICS) and by visual grading analysis (VGA) of in total 224 lumbar spine and 360 chest images. A parallel study of the effect of the H&D curve has also been made using a theoretical model. The contrast ({Delta}OD) of relevant anatomical details was calculated, using a Monte Carlo simulation-model of the complete imaging system including a 3D voxel phantom of a patient. Correlations between the calculated contrast and the radiologists' assessment by VGA were sought. The results of the radiologists' assessment show that the quality in selected regions of lumbar spine and chest images can be significantly improved by the use of films with a steeper H&D curve compared with the standard latitude film. Significant (p<0.05) correlations were found between the VGA results and the calculations of the contrast of transverse processes and trabecular details in the lumbar spine vertebrae, and with the contrast of blood vessels in the retrocardiac area of the chest.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. J. Tapiovaara
Review of relationships between physical measurements and user evaluation of image quality
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 244 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Bath and L G Mansson
Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 80(951): 169 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
S. Borjesson, M. Hakansson, M. Bath, S. Kheddache, S. Svensson, A. Tingberg, A. Grahn, M. Ruschin, B. Hemdal, S. Mattsson, et al.
A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 45 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. Tingberg, M. Bath, M. Hakansson, J. Medin, J. Besjakov, M. Sandborg, G. Alm-Carlsson, S. Mattsson, and L. G. Mansson
Evaluation of image quality of lumbar spine images: a comparison between FFE and VGA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 53 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. Tingberg, F. Eriksson, J. Medin, J. Besjakov, M. Bath, M. Hakansson, M. Sandborg, A. Almen, B. Lanhede, G. Alm-Carlsson, et al.
Inter-observer variation in masked and unmasked images for quality evaluation of clinical radiographs
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 62 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. Tingberg and D. Sjostrom
Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 286 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
B. M. Moores, S. Mattsson, L. G. Mansson, W. Panzer, D. Regulla, D. Dance, G. Alm Carlsson, F. R. Verdun, E. Buhr, and C. Hoeschen
RADIUS--closing the circle on the assessment of imaging performance
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 450 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.