BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 183-188
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/62546157

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saleh, A
Right arrow Articles by Mödder, U
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saleh, A
Right arrow Articles by Mödder, U

Full Paper

Exclusion of brain lesions: is MR contrast medium required after a negative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence?

A Saleh, MD1, F Wenserski, MD1, M Cohnen, MD1, G Fürst, MD1, E Godehardt, PhD2 and U Mödder, MD1

1 Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and 2 Biometric Research Group, Clinic of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany

We hypothesized that in patients with negative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images T2 weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) images and T1 weighted spin-echo (SE) images before and after intravenous administration of gadolinium-based contrast medium display no pathology either. Thus, we assessed the negative predictive value of FLAIR images to rule out MR-detectable brain lesions. 1026 consecutive cranial MR examinations were reviewed. Routine MRI of the brain included T1 weighted coronal imaging before and after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine, axial T2 weighted FSE and fast-FLAIR imaging. The FLAIR images were rated by two radiologists into categories of 0 (without pathologic changes) and 1 (with pathologic changes). Two other radiologists analysed the complete examination. In 284 MR examinations of the brain no abnormalities were found (28%). FLAIR-ratings were false-negative in four cases and false-positive in 30 cases. Sensitivity and specificity of the FLAIR sequence for MR-detectable brain lesions were 99.5% and 89.4%. The unselective application of gadolinium avoided one false-negative MR-reading and improved the sensitivity of the MR-examination from 99.5% to 99.6%. Positive and negative predictive values were 96.1% and 98.4%, respectively. The interobserver reliability was {kappa}=0.93 for the FLAIR-readers and 0.89 for the readers who rated the complete examination. In conclusion, negative FLAIR images provide a high negative predictive value for MR-detectable brain lesions. Thus, in patients with negative FLAIR images the unselective application of gadolinium seems to be unnecessary.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. Cianfoni, M.G.M. Martin, J. Du, J.R. Hesselink, S.G. Imbesi, W.G. Bradley, and G.M. Bydder
Artifact simulating subarachnoid and intraventricular hemorrhage on single-shot, fast spin-echo fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images caused by head movement: A trap for the unwary.
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 843 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.