BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 123-128
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/27339681

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, J V
Right arrow Articles by Hawkes, D J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, J V
Right arrow Articles by Hawkes, D J

Full Paper

Assessment of a technique for 2D–3D registration of cerebral intra-arterial angiography

J V Byrne, FRCR 1 C Colominas, MSc 1 J Hipwell, PhD 2 T Cox, FRCR 3 J A Noble, DPhil 4 G P Penney, PhD 2 and D J Hawkes, PhD 2

1 Department of Neuroradiology, Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HE, 2 Division of Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, Thomas Guy House, Guys Hospital, London SE1 9RT, 3 National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1 3BG and 4 Department of Engineering Sciences, University of Oxford, 17 Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK

This study assesses the ability of a computer algorithm to perform automated 2D–3D registrations of digitally subtracted cerebral angiograms. The technique was tested on clinical studies of five patients with intracranial aneurysms. The automated procedure was compared against a gold standard manual registration, and achieved a mean registration accuracy of 1.3 mm (SD 0.6 mm). Two registration strategies were tested using coarse (128 x 128 pixel) or fine (256 x 256 pixel) images. The mean registration errors proved similar but registration of the lower resolution images was 3 times quicker (mean registration times 33 s, SD 13 s for low and 150 s SD 48 s for high resolution images). The automated techniques were considerably faster than manual registrations but achieved similar accuracy. The technique has several potential uses but is particularly applicable to endovascular treatment techniques.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.