BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 3-14
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/14996943

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, H V
Right arrow Articles by Poynter, A J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by James, H V
Right arrow Articles by Poynter, A J

Review article

Practical experience with intensity-modulated radiotherapy

H V James, MSc, MIPEM1, C D Scrase, MRCP, FRCR2 and A J Poynter, BSc, MIPEM1

Departments of 1 Radiotherapy Physics and 2 Clinical Oncology, The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Heath Road, Ipswich, Suffolk IP4 5PD, UK

At the Ipswich Hospital implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) commenced in February 2001 based on an established 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) service. This paper describes our experiences as we commissioned a fully-integrated IMRT planning and delivery system, and established IMRT within the department. Commissioning measurements incorporated a series of tests to ensure the integrity of the system and form the basis of routine quality assurance (QA) procedures. Potential IMRT patients proceeded through pre-treatment in the same way as standard 3D CRT patients. All were dual-planned for IMRT and 3D CRT with no change in established fractionation regimen, and the resulting plans evaluated. IMRT was selected for treatment where it offered a significant advantage by improving dose homogeneity and conformity within the target volume and/or reducing dose to organs at risk. Extensive pre-treatment verification was undertaken on all plans to check dynamic multileaf collimator (MLC) delivery and monitor unit calculation. Patients were monitored throughout treatment with amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging to ensure reproducibility of set-up. Between June 2001 and June 2003 21 patients were treated with inverse-planned IMRT to sites within the head and neck and lung. IMRT has enabled precise delivery to irregular shaped target volumes, avoiding organs at risk and enabling doses to be increased to radical levels in some cases. Additionally over 200 CT scanned breast patients were treated with forward-planned electronic compensation delivered by dynamic MLC, improving dose homogeneity within the breast volume compared with standard wedged plans. The IMRT programme will continue at the Ipswich Hospital with the introduction of further clinical sites and adoption of more aggressive fractionation regimens within the confines of multicentre clinical trials.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P P Dendy
The President's Conference 2005: "Technology in Imaging and Radiotherapy - towards improved workflow and productivity"
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2006; 79(937): 1 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S Webb
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a clinical reality for cancer treatment, "any fool can understand this": The 2004 Silvanus Thompson Memorial Lecture
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(Special_Issue_2): S64 - S72.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
BJR Review of the Year - 2004
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2005; 78(927): 181 - 185.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A W Beavis
Is tomotherapy the future of IMRT?
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2004; 77(916): 285 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.