BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2003) 76, 803-811
© 2003 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/92706933

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pages, J
Right arrow Articles by Osteaux, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pages, J
Right arrow Articles by Osteaux, M

Full Paper

CT doses in children: a multicentre study

J Pages, PhD 1 N Buls, MSc 2 and M Osteaux, MD, PhD 2

1 Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Applied Sciences Faculty, Pleinlaan 2, 1200 Brussels and 2 Academisch Ziekenhuis Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Radiology Department, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium

We evaluated examination protocols used for common CT procedures of paediatric patients at different hospitals in Belgium in order to determine whether adjustments related to patient size are made in scanning parameters, and to compare patient doses with proposed reference levels. Three paediatric hospitals and one non-paediatric hospital participated in the study. Weighted CT dose-index (CTDIw), dose–length product (DLP) and effective dose (E) were evaluated for three patient ages (1 year, 5 years and 10 years) and three common procedures (brain, thorax and abdomen). CTDIw and DLP values higher than the reference levels were found for all types of evaluated examination. E ranged from 0.4 mSv to 2.3 mSv, 1.1 mSv to 6.6 mSv, and 2.3 mSv to 19.9 mSv for brain, thorax and abdomen examinations, respectively. All centres but one adapted their protocols as a function of patient size. However, no common trend in the selection of protocols was observed. Some centres divided the whole range of patient size into only two/three groups by age, while others classified the patients into six groups by weight. It was also observed that some centres used the same mAs for the total range of patient sizes and decreased the pitch factor for small children, which resulted in higher doses. This indicates the importance of careful selection of technical scan parameters. If CT parameters used for paediatric patients are not adjusted on the basis of examination type, age and/or size of the child, then some patients will be exposed to an unnecessarily high radiation dose during CT examinations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. L. Ward, K. J. Strauss, C. E. Barnewolt, D. Zurakowski, V. Venkatakrishnan, F. H. Fahey, R. L. Lebowitz, and G. A. Taylor
Pediatric Radiation Exposure and Effective Dose Reduction during Voiding Cystourethrography
Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 1002 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K Fujii, T Aoyama, S Koyama, and C Kawaura
Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses for paediatric patients with those for adults in chest and abdominal CT examinations
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2007; 80(956): 657 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. L. Hollingsworth, T. T. Yoshizumi, D. P. Frush, F. P. Chan, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, C. R. Lowry, and L. M. Hurwitz
Pediatric Cardiac-Gated CT Angiography: Assessment of Radiation Dose
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 12 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Tsapaki, J. E. Aldrich, R. Sharma, M. A. Staniszewska, A. Krisanachinda, M. Rehani, A. Hufton, C. Triantopoulou, P. N. Maniatis, J. Papailiou, et al.
Dose Reduction in CT while Maintaining Diagnostic Confidence: Diagnostic Reference Levels at Routine Head, Chest, and Abdominal CT--IAEA-coordinated Research Project
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 828 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2003 by the British Institute of Radiology.