This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schultz, F W Articles by Zoetelief, J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schultz, F W Articles by Zoetelief, J

Monte Carlo calculations for assessment of radiation dose to patients with congenital heart defects and to staff during cardiac catheterizations

¹ Interfaculty Reactor Institute, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 15, 2629 JB Delft and ² Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

Correspondence: F W Schultz, Interfaculty Reactor Institute (IRI/ST-MSF), Mekelweg 15, 2629 JB Delft, The Netherlands

Effective dose is an important quantity in relation to assessment of radiation risk. Organ and effective doses to paediatric patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic heart catheterization procedures can be assessed by combining relatively simple measurements, e.g. of dose–area product (DAP), and calculated dose conversion factors (DCF). This also holds for the radiation dose to the hospital staff, e.g. the cardiologist. Monte Carlo (MC) simulation of radiation transport in mathematical anthropomorphic phantoms is used to obtain the DCFs, which strongly depend on beam quality and geometrical parameters. The performance of a dedicated fast MC code (PCXMC) for patient dosimetry is compared with that of a more elaborate general purpose MC code (MCNP). Resulting organ doses sometimes may differ considerably, partly due to phantom differences. While MCNP uses separate male and female mathematical phantoms, PCXMC uses a hermaphrodite. However, both codes yield effective doses that agree rather well, so PCXMC can be used for convenience. The MCNP code is used to calculate the effective dose to the cardiologist exposed to radiation scattered from the patient. Without protective clothing, effective dose per procedure to the cardiologist is at least two orders of magnitude lower than that to the patient. The effectiveness of various types and thickness of protective clothing has been evaluated for one view of one cardiac catheterization. The results of the calculations do not contradict experimental studies from the literature. MC simulation may serve as a useful tool to improve the accuracy of estimating occupational effective dose from personal dose monitors.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A KARAMBATSAKIDOU, B SAHLGREN, B HANSSON, M LIDEGRAN, and A FRANSSON Effective dose conversion factors in paediatric interventional cardiology Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2009; 82(981): 748 - 755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Tsapaki, S. Kottou, S. Korniotis, N. Nikolaki, S. Rammos, and S. C. Apostolopoulou RADIATION DOSES IN PAEDIATRIC INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY PROCEDURES Radiat Prot Dosimetry, January 2, 2009; (2009) ncn313v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.B. Nauer, F. Kellner-Weldon, G. Von Allmen, D. Schaller, and J. Gralla Effective Doses from Scan Projection Radiographs of the Head: Impact of Different Scanning Practices and Comparison with Conventional Radiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2009; 30(1): 155 - 159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Irving, G. J. Maree, E. R. Hering, and T. S. Douglas Radiation dose from a linear slit scanning X-ray machine with full-body imaging capabilities Radiat Prot Dosimetry, July 1, 2008; 130(4): 482 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. W. Schultz and J. Zoetelief DOSEMETER READINGS AND EFFECTIVE DOSE TO THE CARDIOLOGIST WITH PROTECTIVE CLOTHING IN A SIMULATED INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURE Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 3, 2008; (2008) ncn085v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Smans, E. Vano, R. Sanchez, F. W. Schultz, J. Zoetelief, T. Kiljunen, C. Maccia, H. Jarvinen, R. Bly, A. Kosunen, et al. Results of a European survey on patient doses in paediatric radiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 204 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. H. Park, J. K. Lee, and C. Lee Dose conversion coefficients calculated using tomographic phantom, KTMAN-2, for X-ray examination of cardiac catheterisation Radiat Prot Dosimetry, February 1, 2008; 128(3): 351 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T Siiskonen, M Tapiovaara, A Kosunen, M Lehtinen, and E Vartiainen Monte Carlo simulations of occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2007; 80(954): 460 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R R Bridcut, E Murphy, A Workman, P Flynn, and R J Winder Patient dose from 3D rotational neurovascular studies Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2007; 80(953): 362 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D G W Onnasch, F K Schroder, G Fischer, and H-H Kramer Diagnostic reference levels and effective dose in paediatric cardiac catheterization Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 80(951): 177 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Th. M. Jansen and J. Zoetelief Dose constraints and guidance for exposure of individuals knowingly and willingly helping in the support and comfort of individuals undergoing medical exposure Radiat Prot Dosimetry, June 1, 2006; 118(3): 315 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. W. Schultz and J. Zoetelief Estimating effective dose for a cardiac catheterisation procedure with single or double personal dosemeters Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 1, 2006; 118(2): 196 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. W. Schultz and J. Zoetelief Dose conversion coefficients for interventional procedures Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 225 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. N. Kroon 3-Dimensional rotational X-ray imaging, 3D-RX: image quality and patient dose simulation for optimisation studies Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 341 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]