BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2003) 76, 519-524
© 2003 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/67551353

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pilling, J R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pilling, J R

Full Paper

Picture archiving and communication systems: the users' view

J R Pilling, FRCR

Radiology Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK

A study was undertaken to assess the acceptability to users of a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). A questionnaire was issued to 208 users. Some questions required a graduated score in response and others a free text response. 101 responses were received from a cross section of hospital staff. The majority of users judged PACS to be a major advance for the hospital, with high quality images, less frustration than using film and an improvement in their working lives. They judged that it had made a positive change in their working practices and had met their expectations. They welcomed the access it gave them to Radiology reports. There was more ambivalence about the impact it had made to the efficiency of clinic consultations and the conduct of ward rounds. Free text responses were made concerning the benefits and disadvantages of PACS. Analysis of these demonstrated many more benefits than disadvantages. The Radiology department has been enabled to address the concerns of staff raised through the questionnaire, and has been encouraged by the positive responses. PACS has been accepted well by a wide cross section of hospital staff. It has improved their working lives and made a major contribution to the working of the hospital as a whole.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
K. G Yallop and E. Makin
Difficulties with the picture archive and communication system for the transferred patient
Arch. Dis. Child., March 1, 2007; 92(3): 279 - 279.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
A. P. Gurses and Y. Xiao
A Systematic Review of the Literature on Multidisciplinary Rounds to Design Information Technology
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2006; 13(3): 267 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. E. Roos, B. Chilla, M. Zanetti, M. Schmid, P. Koch, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, and J. Hodler
MRI of Meniscal Lesions: Soft-Copy (PACS) and Hard-Copy Evaluation Versus Reviewer Experience.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 786 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
Z. Paskins and A. Rai
The impact of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) implementation in rheumatology
Rheumatology, March 1, 2006; 45(3): 354 - 355.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D MacVicar
Are you sitting comfortably?
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2005; 78(931): 581 - 581.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D Blunt and D O'Regan
Using PACS as a teaching resource
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2005; 78(930): 483 - 484.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2003 by the British Institute of Radiology.