This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Obenauer, S Articles by Grabbe, E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Obenauer, S Articles by Grabbe, E

Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study

Department of Radiology, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37 075 Göttingen, Germany

Correspondence: Dr. med. Silvia Obenauer. Department of Radiology, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37 075 Göttingen, Germany

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential for radiation dose reduction by using other beam qualities in full-field digital mammography (FFDM) compared with screen–film mammography (SFM). FFDM was performed using an amorphous silicon detector with a caesium iodide scintillator layer (Senographe 2000D, GE, Milwaukee, USA). SFM was performed using a state-of-the-art conventional system (Senographe DMR, GE, Milwaukee, USA) with a dedicated screen–film combination. An anthropomorphic breast phantom with superimposed microcalcifications (50–200 µm) was used to evaluate the detectability of microcalcifications. Contact mammograms and magnification views (m=1.8) performed with both the digital and the screen–film system were compared. Images were exposed automatically. Molybdenum/Molybdenum (Mo/Mo) anode–filter combination, 28 kVp and 63 mAs were selected by the automatic optimization of parameters (AOP) of the conventional system. This exposure protocol (protocol A) was also used as baseline for the digital system. Dose reduction in digital mammography was achieved by using protocol B with Mo/Rh and 31 kVp and protocol C with Rh/Rh and 32 kVp. The detectability of microcalcifications was assessed by 3 experienced readers with a confidence level ranging from 1 to 5. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. In protocol A the area under the ROC-curve (A_z) for contact views performed by the screen–film system was 0.64 and for those performed with the FFDM system 0.68. The A_z values were 0.74 in protocol B and 0.65 in protocol C for the digital system. For the conventional and digital magnification views A_z values were 0.71 and 0.79, respectively. For protocol B the A_z value was 0.81 and for protocol C it was 0.76. There is no statistically significant difference in the A_z values for the different protocols in digital mammography and no significant difference from the screen–film system. A potential for dose reduction by using other beam qualities seems to be possible with this digital system.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Samei, R. S. Saunders Jr, J. A. Baker, and D. M. Delong Digital Mammography: Effects of Reduced Radiation Dose on Diagnostic Performance Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 396 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Mahesh AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Digital Mammography: An Overview RadioGraphics, November 1, 2004; 24(6): 1747 - 1760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]