This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gallacher, D J Articles by Saunders, J E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gallacher, D J Articles by Saunders, J E

Use of a quality index in threshold contrast detail detection measurements in television fluoroscopy

¹ Medical Physics Department, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, ² King's Centre for Assessment of Radiological Equipment (KCARE), King's Hospital, London, ³ Medical Physics Department, Princess Margaret Hospital, Swindon and ⁴ Formerly Medical Physics Department, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK

The use of a single index to assist in quality control procedures of X-ray television fluoroscopy systems was investigated. A single quality index was devised incorporating a measure of threshold contrast detail detectability (TCDD) performance and taking into account image intensifier input kerma rate, field size, differences in radiation beam quality, and pulsed fluoroscopy. This was applied to a number of clinical systems to investigate changes in image quality index quantified over time. Accepted measurement protocols were used to obtain these measurements. The results show system performance for different systems and can establish the decline in performance parameters over time or assess non-optimal image quality with clinical systems in field measurements. The systems studied were assessed with a variety of performance parameters including TCDD results, low contrast sensitivity, limiting resolution, and image intensifier input kerma rate under clinical modes of operation. The TCDD quality index, and dose normalized quality index, were found to be useful image quality assessment parameters for serial testing of systems, which augment the use of graphical methods for the display of TCDD curves.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Walsh, D. Gorman, P. Byrne, A. Larkin, A. Dowling, and J. F. Malone QUALITY ASSURANCE OF COMPUTED AND DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 4, 2008; (2008) ncn047v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Kepler and A. Vladimirov Optimisation strategies introduced for CR at health care centres in Estonia Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 127 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I D Honey, A Mackenzie, and D S Evans Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2005; 78(929): 422 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D S Evans, A Mackenzie, C P Lawinski, and D Smith Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2004; 77(921): 751 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]