This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Soldt, R T M Articles by Zoetelief, J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Soldt, R T M Articles by Zoetelief, J

Survey of posteroanterior chest radiography in The Netherlands: patient dose and image quality

¹ Interfaculty Reactor Institute Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 15, 2629 JB Delft and ² Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands

Correspondence: J Zoetelief

Council Directive 97/43/Euratom (Medical Exposure Directive) states that member States of the European Union shall promote the establishment and use of diagnostic reference levels for radio-diagnostic examinations. Dose surveys can form the basis for the establishment of diagnostic reference levels. In view of the implementation of the Medical Exposure Directive in the Netherlands, a survey of dose and image quality has been performed for posteroanterior (PA) chest radiography in 2001. In this survey, 25 participants were selected from a list of 175 Dutch hospitals, whereas in a previous PA chest survey (about 10 years ago) participation was voluntary and participants came predominantly from the south-western part of the Netherlands. For conventional screen–film PA chest radiography, the present results for patient dose and image quality are quite similar to those results from the previous survey. The fraction of conventional X-ray systems utilizing lung compensation filters has remained approximately the same. For dedicated digital chest radiography systems, image quality is better than for conventional systems, but doses vary and can assume relatively high values. The results indicate that there are still possibilities for dose reduction, without loss of image quality. The 75 percentile value of the entrance surface dose distribution is approximately 0.13 mGy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. A. Mettler Jr, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, and M. Mahesh Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 254 - 263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Zoetelief, H. H. E. Idris, and J. T. M. Jansen Investigation of possible methods for equipment self-tests in digital radiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 269 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Zoetelief, R. T. M. van Soldt, I. I. Suliman, J. T. M. Jansen, and H. Bosmans Quality control of equipment used in digital and interventional radiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 277 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Neofotistou, V. Tsapaki, S. Kottou, A. Schreiner-Karoussou, and E. Vano Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 204 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I D Honey, A Mackenzie, and D S Evans Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2005; 78(929): 422 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Compagnone, L. Pagan, and C. Bergamini Local diagnostic reference levels in standard X-ray examinations Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 18, 2005; 113(1): 54 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]