This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carroll, E M Articles by Brennan, P C Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Carroll, E M Articles by Brennan, P C

Radiation doses for barium enema and barium meal examinations in Ireland: potential diagnostic reference levels

School of Diagnostic Imaging, University College Dublin, St. Anthony's, Herbert Avenue, Dublin 4, Ireland

Correspondence: P C Brennan

Wide variations in patient dose for the same examinations have been demonstrated by several studies throughout Europe. By investigating patient dose, variations can be acknowledged, causal agents sought and the necessary adjustments made. Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) provide a framework with which dose levels from individual hospitals are compared, and when exceeded, corrective actions can be taken where appropriate. This study aimed to establish DRLs for barium enema and barium meal examinations in Ireland. Measurements were recorded using a dose–area product meter in 12 hospitals representing 33% of relevant hospitals. Results demonstrated wide mean hospital dose variation, by up to a factor of 7.8 and 4.2 for barium enema and barium meal examinations, respectively. Minimum and maximum individual patient dose values varied by a factor of 45 for barium enemas and 90 for barium meal examinations. Reasons for dose variations were complex, but major factors for both examinations were fluoroscopy time, secondary radiation grid type and level of filtration. Some examination-specific factors were also noted. DRLs, established using the quantity dose–area product, were calculated to be 47 Gy cm² for barium enemas and 17 Gy cm² for barium meal examinations. Although the DRL value for barium meals was the same as the reference value established in the UK for that examination in 1996, the barium enema DRL in this study was 45% higher than the relevant UK value.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C J D'HELFT, P C BRENNAN, A M MCGEE, S L MCFADDEN, C M HUGHES, J R WINDER, and L A RAINFORD Potential Irish dose reference levels for cardiac interventional examinations Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2009; 82(976): 296 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Lanca, A. Silva, E. Alves, F. Serranheira, and M. Correia EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE PARAMETERS IN PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH EUROPEAN GUIDELINES Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 22, 2008; (2008) ncn144v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Jaffe, A. M. Gaca, S. Delaney, T. T. Yoshizumi, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and D. P. Frush Radiation Doses from Small-Bowel Follow-Through and Abdominopelvic MDCT in Crohn's Disease Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1015 - 1022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M. McCartney Radiation Dose During Barium Enema Radiol. Technol., September 1, 2007; 79(1): 91 - 93. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. SEERAM and P. C. BRENNAN Diagnostic Reference Levels In Radiology. Radiol. Technol., May 1, 2006; 77(5): 373 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Compagnone, L. Pagan, and C. Bergamini Local diagnostic reference levels in standard X-ray examinations Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 18, 2005; 113(1): 54 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C J Martin A review of factors affecting patient doses for barium enemas and meals Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2004; 77(922): 864 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]