| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Full Paper |
Department of Clinical Physics & Bioengineering, Health Physics Division, Lower Ground Floor, Divisional Offices (west), Western Infirmary, Glasgow G11 6NT, UK
The purpose of this study was to ascertain the magnitude and distribution of doses to the legs of radiologists when performing interventional procedures. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD100 chips were used to measure simultaneously doses to the lower limbs and, for comparison, the hands during 100 interventional procedures. Results show leg dose was dependent upon type and complexity of procedure, equipment used and whether lead protection was available. Where no lead protection was used, the doses to the lower limbs were frequently similar to or higher than those received by the hands. The mean dose to the legs ranged from 0.19 mSv to 2.61 mSv per procedure, compared with 0.04 mSv to 1.25 mSv to the hands. During transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and embolisation procedures the leg dose could be as much as 23 times greater than that to the hands. When lead protection was used, the dose to the legs was reduced significantly to 0.02 mSv to 0.5 mSv per procedure. A clear linear relationship was shown between the dosearea product (DAP) reading and the dose to the feet of the radiologist. As a "rule of thumb", a DAP reading of 100 Gy cm2 will give a dose of 1 mSv to the legs, if no lead protection was used, dropping to approximately 0.02 mSv if lead protection was present. This study demonstrates that the dose to the legs of radiologists can be higher than that to the hands when no lead protection is used. The inclusion of a lead screen to protect the legs is an effective method of dose reduction when performing interventional procedures.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. J. Martin A REVIEW OF RADIOLOGY STAFF DOSES AND DOSE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 16, 2009; (2009) ncp168v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V TSAPAKI, P N MANIATIS, A MAGGINAS, V VOUDRIS, S PATSILINAKOS, T VRANZTA, E VANO, and D S COKKINOS What are the clinical and technical factors that influence the kerma-area product in percutaneous coronary intervention? Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2008; 81(972): 940 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Vanhavere, E. Carinou, L. Donadille, M. Ginjaume, J. Jankowski, A. Rimpler, and M. Sans Merce AN OVERVIEW ON EXTREMITY DOSIMETRY IN MEDICAL APPLICATIONS Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 29, 2008; (2008) ncn149v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Tsapaki, S. Patsilinakos, V. Voudris, A. Magginas, S. Pavlidis, T. Maounis, G. Theodorakis, M. Koutelou, T. Vrantza, M. Nearchou, et al. Level of patient and operator dose in the largest cardiac centre in Greece Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 71 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Schueler, T. J. Vrieze, H. Bjarnason, and A. W. Stanson An Investigation of Operator Exposure in Interventional Radiology RadioGraphics, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 1533 - 1541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Vano, L. Gonzalez, J. M. Fernandez, C. Prieto, and E. Guibelalde Influence of patient thickness and operation modes on occupational and patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, June 1, 2006; 118(3): 325 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Hidajat, P Wust, M Kreuschner, R Felix, and R-J Schroder Radiation risks for the radiologist performing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2006; 79(942): 483 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Goni, D. Papadopoulou, Em. Yakoumakis, N. Stratigis, J. Benos, V. Siriopoulou, Tr. Makri, and Ev. Georgiou Investigation of occupational radiation exposure during interventional cardiac catheterisations performed via radial artery Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 107 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Whitby and C J Martin A study of the distribution of dose across the hands of interventional radiologists and cardiologists Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2005; 78(927): 219 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |