BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2003) 76, 321-327
© 2003 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/65778215

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitby, M
Right arrow Articles by Martin, C J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whitby, M
Right arrow Articles by Martin, C J

Full Paper

Radiation doses to the legs of radiologists performing interventional procedures: are they a cause for concern?

M Whitby, MSc and C J Martin, PhD

Department of Clinical Physics & Bioengineering, Health Physics Division, Lower Ground Floor, Divisional Offices (west), Western Infirmary, Glasgow G11 6NT, UK

The purpose of this study was to ascertain the magnitude and distribution of doses to the legs of radiologists when performing interventional procedures. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD100 chips were used to measure simultaneously doses to the lower limbs and, for comparison, the hands during 100 interventional procedures. Results show leg dose was dependent upon type and complexity of procedure, equipment used and whether lead protection was available. Where no lead protection was used, the doses to the lower limbs were frequently similar to or higher than those received by the hands. The mean dose to the legs ranged from 0.19 mSv to 2.61 mSv per procedure, compared with 0.04 mSv to 1.25 mSv to the hands. During transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and embolisation procedures the leg dose could be as much as 2–3 times greater than that to the hands. When lead protection was used, the dose to the legs was reduced significantly to 0.02 mSv to 0.5 mSv per procedure. A clear linear relationship was shown between the dose–area product (DAP) reading and the dose to the feet of the radiologist. As a "rule of thumb", a DAP reading of 100 Gy cm2 will give a dose of 1 mSv to the legs, if no lead protection was used, dropping to approximately 0.02 mSv if lead protection was present. This study demonstrates that the dose to the legs of radiologists can be higher than that to the hands when no lead protection is used. The inclusion of a lead screen to protect the legs is an effective method of dose reduction when performing interventional procedures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
C. J. Martin
A REVIEW OF RADIOLOGY STAFF DOSES AND DOSE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 16, 2009; (2009) ncp168v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
V TSAPAKI, P N MANIATIS, A MAGGINAS, V VOUDRIS, S PATSILINAKOS, T VRANZTA, E VANO, and D S COKKINOS
What are the clinical and technical factors that influence the kerma-area product in percutaneous coronary intervention?
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2008; 81(972): 940 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
F. Vanhavere, E. Carinou, L. Donadille, M. Ginjaume, J. Jankowski, A. Rimpler, and M. Sans Merce
AN OVERVIEW ON EXTREMITY DOSIMETRY IN MEDICAL APPLICATIONS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 29, 2008; (2008) ncn149v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
V. Tsapaki, S. Patsilinakos, V. Voudris, A. Magginas, S. Pavlidis, T. Maounis, G. Theodorakis, M. Koutelou, T. Vrantza, M. Nearchou, et al.
Level of patient and operator dose in the largest cardiac centre in Greece
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 71 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. A. Schueler, T. J. Vrieze, H. Bjarnason, and A. W. Stanson
An Investigation of Operator Exposure in Interventional Radiology
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 1533 - 1541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
E. Vano, L. Gonzalez, J. M. Fernandez, C. Prieto, and E. Guibelalde
Influence of patient thickness and operation modes on occupational and patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, June 1, 2006; 118(3): 325 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N Hidajat, P Wust, M Kreuschner, R Felix, and R-J Schroder
Radiation risks for the radiologist performing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2006; 79(942): 483 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
H. Goni, D. Papadopoulou, Em. Yakoumakis, N. Stratigis, J. Benos, V. Siriopoulou, Tr. Makri, and Ev. Georgiou
Investigation of occupational radiation exposure during interventional cardiac catheterisations performed via radial artery
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 107 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Whitby and C J Martin
A study of the distribution of dose across the hands of interventional radiologists and cardiologists
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2005; 78(927): 219 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2003 by the British Institute of Radiology.