This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Winfield, E A Articles by Aird, E G A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Winfield, E A Articles by Aird, E G A

Survey of tangential field planning and dose distribution in the UK: background to the introduction of the quality assurance programme for the START trial in early breast cancer

¹ Marie Curie Research Wing, Mount Vernon Hospital, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN and ² Department of Medical Physics, Mount Vernon Hospital, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK

Correspondence: Elizabeth Winfield, Research Radiographer, Radiotherapy department, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK (current address)

A background survey of UK breast radiotherapy techniques was performed prior to the introduction of the quality assurance programme for the Standardization of Radiotherapy (START) trial in breast cancer, a UK multicentre randomized trial of different dose fractionations for breast radiotherapy. Analysis of patient treatment plans was performed at this initial stage of the quality assurance programme to ensure eventual uniformity of treatment within the randomized trial and hence ensure reliable end results.

As an integral part of this initial survey, three patient outlines of different size and shape were circulated between November 1997 and January 1998 to 56 UK radiotherapy centres. Dose distributions were produced according to the routine planning protocol of each department to provide information on treatment planning techniques. Criteria used for treatment plan production and the resultant dose distributions were analysed. The dose distributions varied between centres. Dose inhomogeneity of no more than 10% was achieved, on the central axis, for all chest wall and medium breast size plans. The number of larger breast size distributions exceeding a 10% dose gradient across the treatment volume was 54% (26). Most centres in the UK determine the breast dose distribution by planning on a two-dimensional contour taken along the central plane of the breast. Variation in the breast contour either side of this central plane is not taken into account. Care with plan optimization by selecting the most appropriate beam parameters can lead to an improvement in breast dosimetry.