BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2003) 76, 232-237
© 2003 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/79291075

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duggan, L
Right arrow Articles by Kron, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duggan, L
Right arrow Articles by Kron, T

Full Paper

Investigation of dose reduction in neonatal radiography using specially designed phantoms and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs

L Duggan, PhD1,2,, H Warren-Forward, PhD3, T Smith, MSc FIR3 and T Kron, PhD1,2

1 Newcastle Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Waratah NSW 2298, 2 University of Newcastle, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences (Physics) Callaghan NSW 2308 and 3 University of Newcastle, School of Health Sciences (Medical Radiation Science), Callaghan NSW 2308, Australia

Many departments still do not use recommended radiographic parameters to X-ray neonates. Direct, accurate dose measurements of individual examinations may assist a department in justifying technique modifications that provide a substantial dose reduction without a significant loss of image quality. The aim of this study was to investigate dose reduction techniques for neonates in the intensive care unit. Alterations in beam energy (kVp and filtration) and collimation were investigated using specially designed phantoms mimicking a 700 g and 2000 g neonate, and ultrasensitive LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs).

Differences in entrance surface dose (ESD) and dose at depth (3 cm or 5 cm) were compared for two, overlapping fields centred individually on the chest and abdomen (Technique 1) and one large chest-abdomen field (Technique 2 or babygram). The large phantom was irradiated at 54 kVp, 60 kVp and 70 kVp without additional filtration and at 66 kVp and 70 kVp with a rare-earth hafnium filter. Focus–film distance (FFD) and mAs were adjusted to maintain optical density (OD) on each radiograph.

The baseline dose at 54 kVp and 100 cm FFD was (46±2) µGy. Increasing the tube potential from 54 kVp to 70 kVp without additional filtration reduced the ESD by 27%. However, the addition of a 0.05 mm hafnium filter at 66 kVp further reduced the radiation dose by 13%, to produce an ESD of (28±2) µGy. All contrast details were observable at 66 kVp with hafnium filtration.

Technique 1 may lead to an increase in effective dose due to field overlap, which diverges at depth, and increased scatter at the periphery of the fields.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2003 by the British Institute of Radiology.