This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kuon, E Articles by Pfahlberg, A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kuon, E Articles by Pfahlberg, A

Time of day influences patient radiation exposure from percutaneous cardiac interventions

¹ Department of Cardiology, Klinik Fraenkische Schweiz, Feuersteinstr. 2, D-91320 Ebermannstadt, ² Department of Cardiology, Ernst Moritz Arndt University, Friedrich-Loeffler Str. 23, 17487 Greifswald, and ³ Institute for Computer Sciences, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuernberg, Waldstr. 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

Correspondence: Dr Eberhard Kuon, Klinik Fraenkische Schweiz, Feuersteinstr. 2, D-91320 Ebermannstadt, Germany

The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of time of day on patient radiation exposure due to cardiac interventions. The elective interventional workload of one experienced cardiologist documented over the course of 4 months amounted to 325 diagnostic catheterizations and 145 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). All radiation parameters documented during diagnostic coronary angiography remained constant throughout the entire day. In contrast, for PCI measurements made from 7:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., our study revealed a mean overall dose–area product (DAP) of 11.8±6.8 Gy cm² (n=115). These radiation exposure levels increased significantly later in the afternoon (n=30) by 28% to a level of 15.0±11.1 Gy cm² (p<0.045). Cinegraphic DAP increased from 3.7±2.7 Gy cm² to 5.0±3.2 Gy cm² (p<0.033). The number of cinegraphic runs and frames rose from 7.9±2.9 to 9.1±3.1 (p<0.025), and from 136±63 to 164±70 (p<0.014), respectively. The following conclusion is warranted by our data and should now be confirmed in a wider multicentre study: radiation protection of the patients could be influenced by the fatigue of the cardiologist conducting the procedure. To enhance patient radiation safety, elective percutaneous angioplasty should be scheduled for the first 6 h of the interventionalist's occupational workload. Diagnostic interventions may be safely scheduled later.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K FAULKNER and A WERDUCH An estimate of the collective dose to the European population from cardiac X-ray procedures Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2008; 81(972): 955 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Kuon Radiation exposure in invasive cardiology Heart, May 1, 2008; 94(5): 667 - 674. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Einstein, K. W. Moser, R. C. Thompson, M. D. Cerqueira, and M. J. Henzlova Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11): 1290 - 1305. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Kuon, J. B. Dahm, K. Empen, D. M. Robinson, G. Reuter, and M. Wucherer Identification of less-irradiating tube angulations in invasive cardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1420 - 1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Minerva BMJ, October 6, 2003; 327(7418): E243 - 243. [Full Text] [PDF]