BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2003) 76, 189-191
© 2003 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/14780035

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuon, E
Right arrow Articles by Pfahlberg, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuon, E
Right arrow Articles by Pfahlberg, A

Short communication

Time of day influences patient radiation exposure from percutaneous cardiac interventions

E Kuon, MD1, J B Dahm, MD2, M Schmitt, MD1, C Glaser, MD1, O Gefeller, PhD3 and A Pfahlberg, PhD3

1 Department of Cardiology, Klinik Fraenkische Schweiz, Feuersteinstr. 2, D-91320 Ebermannstadt, 2 Department of Cardiology, Ernst Moritz Arndt University, Friedrich-Loeffler Str. 23, 17487 Greifswald, and 3 Institute for Computer Sciences, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuernberg, Waldstr. 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

Correspondence: Dr Eberhard Kuon, Klinik Fraenkische Schweiz, Feuersteinstr. 2, D-91320 Ebermannstadt, Germany

The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of time of day on patient radiation exposure due to cardiac interventions. The elective interventional workload of one experienced cardiologist documented over the course of 4 months amounted to 325 diagnostic catheterizations and 145 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). All radiation parameters documented during diagnostic coronary angiography remained constant throughout the entire day. In contrast, for PCI measurements made from 7:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., our study revealed a mean overall dose–area product (DAP) of 11.8±6.8 Gy cm2 (n=115). These radiation exposure levels increased significantly later in the afternoon (n=30) by 28% to a level of 15.0±11.1 Gy cm2 (p<0.045). Cinegraphic DAP increased from 3.7±2.7 Gy cm2 to 5.0±3.2 Gy cm2 (p<0.033). The number of cinegraphic runs and frames rose from 7.9±2.9 to 9.1±3.1 (p<0.025), and from 136±63 to 164±70 (p<0.014), respectively. The following conclusion is warranted by our data and should now be confirmed in a wider multicentre study: radiation protection of the patients could be influenced by the fatigue of the cardiologist conducting the procedure. To enhance patient radiation safety, elective percutaneous angioplasty should be scheduled for the first 6 h of the interventionalist's occupational workload. Diagnostic interventions may be safely scheduled later.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2003 by the British Institute of Radiology.