BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gunnarsson, M
Right arrow Articles by Mattsson, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gunnarsson, M
Right arrow Articles by Mattsson, S
British Journal of Radiology 75 (2002),982-986 © 2002 The British Institute of Radiology

Full Paper

No radiation protection reasons for restrictions on 14C urea breath tests in children

M Gunnarsson, PhD 1 S Leide-Svegborn, PhD 1,2 K Stenström, PhD 3 G Skog, PhD 4 L-E Nilsson, BSc 5 R Hellborg, PhD 3 and S Mattsson, PhD 1

1 Department of Radiation Physics, Lund University, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, 2 Department of Laboratory and Imaging Sciences, Malmö University College, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, 3 Department of Nuclear Physics, Lund University, Box 118, SE-221 00 Lund, 4 Department of Quaternary Geology, Lund University, Tornavägen 13, SE-223 63 Lund 5 Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden

Traditional 14C urea breath tests are normally not used for younger children because the radiation exposure is unknown. High sensitivity accelerator mass spectrometry and an ultra-low amount (440 Bq) of 14C urea were therefore used both to diagnose Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection in seven children, aged 3–6 years, and to make radiation dose estimates. The activity used was 125 times lower than the amount normally used for older children and 250 times lower than that used for adults. Results were compared with previously reported biokinetic and dosimetric data for adults and older children aged 7–14 years. 14C activity concentrations in urine and exhaled air per unit administered activity for younger children (3–6 years) correspond well with those for older children (7–14 years). For a child aged 3–6 years who is HP negative, the urinary bladder wall receives the highest absorbed dose, 0.3 mGy MBq-1. The effective dose is 0.1 mSv MBq-1 for the 3-year-old child and 0.07 mSv MBq-1 for the 6-year-old child. For two children, the 10 min and 20 min post-14C administration samples of exhaled air showed a significantly higher amount of 14C activity than for the rest of the children, that is 6% and 19% of administered activity exhaled per hour compared with 0.3–0.9% (mean 0.5%) of administered activity exhaled per hour indicating that these two children that is were HP positive. For a 3-year-old HP positive child, absorbed dose to the urinary bladder wall was 0.3 mGy MBq-1 and effective dose per unit of administered activity was 0.4 mSv MBq-1. Using 55 kBq, which is a normal amount for older children when liquid scintillation counters are used for measurement, the effective dose will be approximately 6 µSv to a 3-year-old HP negative child and 20 µSv to a HP positive child. Thus there is no reason for restrictions on performing a normal 14C urea breath test, even on young children.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
cfpHome page
Y. Bentur, D. Matsui, and G. Koren
Safety of 14C-UBT for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in pregnancy
Can Fam Physician, May 1, 2009; 55(5): 479 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
R. W. Leggett
A biokinetic model for carbon dioxide and bicarbonate
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, February 1, 2004; 108(3): 203 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.