BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, R A
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, R A
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, S
British Journal of Radiology 75 (2002),831-836 © 2002 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Macroradiography using conventional radiographic X-ray equipment

R A Davidson, BBus, MIR, GAIP 1 and S Bowman, PhD, MA, SRR 2

1 School of Clinical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Booroma Road, Wagga Wagga NSW 2678 and 2 Whyalla Campus, University of South Australia, Whyalla SA 5600, Australia

Macroradiography is a radiographic imaging technique used to increase the size of the image relative to that of the object. Macroradiographic images suffer degradation due mainly to geometric unsharpness (Ug). Ug results from the finite size of the focal spot of the X-ray tube. Specialized equipment with a small effective focal spot size (Eff FSS) is generally used to perform macroradiography. The specialized nature of the equipment means macroradiographic examinations are not commonly undertaken. Macroradiographic examinations can also be performed on conventional radiographic equipment because the Eff FSS varies in the X-ray beam along the cathode–anode axis. Calculations and measurements of FSSs at different positions along the cathode–anode direction of the X-ray beam have been made. A simple technique of angling the X-ray tube 10° towards the cathode reduces the Eff FSS in one dimension while still maintaining a vertical central ray. Reduced beam coverage results from this technique and an increase in radiographic exposure is required to compensate for the anode heel effect. Macroradiographic images of line pair phantoms and a hand-wrist phantom, at various tube angles, have been obtained to compare image detail.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.