BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crawley, M T
Right arrow Articles by Booth, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crawley, M T
Right arrow Articles by Booth, A
British Journal of Radiology 75 (2002),652-656 © 2002 The British Institute of Radiology

Full Paper

Reducing dose at barium enema: radiographers do it digitally

M T Crawley, BSc, MSc1 and A Booth, MRCP, FRCR2

Departments of 1 Medical Physics and 2 Radiology, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Mandeville Road, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire HP21 8AL, UK

It has been previously shown that, whilst radiographers in our hospital can undertake barium enema examinations with the same degree of diagnostic accuracy as consultant radiologists, there was a dose penalty to the patient arising from the use of a restrictive protocol requiring radiographers to take a series of plain radiographs for reporting purposes. For the past 3 years radiographers at this hospital have worked to a new protocol that replaces all routine radiographs with digital spot films. In the present study, dose–area product (DAP) measurements for 801 barium enema examinations performed by consultant radiologists and radiographers, using the revised protocol, were analysed and compared to ascertain whether there were still significant differences in radiation dose to the patient depending on the category of staff performing the examination. All examinations were reported by a consultant radiologist. The radiologists' reports were analysed against the known outcomes to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the examination when carried out by the two categories of staff. This study shows that using a modified protocol, in which digital spot films replace the series of overcouch radiographs for reporting, our radiographers are able to perform barium enemas without dose penalty to the patient, and without compromizing diagnostic accuracy. Means with 95% confidence intervals for DAP in the two groups were 9.8 Gycm2 (9.4–10.3 Gycm2) and 10.7 Gycm2 (10.2–11.1 Gycm2) for radiographers and radiologists, respectively.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.