BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maskell, N A
Right arrow Articles by Butland, R J A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maskell, N A
Right arrow Articles by Butland, R J A
British Journal of Radiology 75 (2002),648-651 © 2002 The British Institute of Radiology

Full Paper

The use of automated strain gauge plethysmography in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis

N A Maskell, MRCP1, S Cooke, MB, MRCP, FRCR2, D J Meecham Jones, FRCP1, J G Prior, MD, FRCP1 and R J A Butland, MA, MD, FRCP1

1 Medical Directorate, Gloucestershire Royal NHS Trust, Gloucester and 2 Radiology Department, Gloucestershire Royal NHS Trust, Gloucester, UK

The venometer is a nurse- or technician-operated machine that uses automated strain gauge plethysmography to detect deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We compared the venometer with contrast venography to determine its accuracy, and also used it to triage patients between admission with subsequent anticoagulation and out-patient investigation without anticoagulation. We enrolled 307 consecutive patients presenting to the medical admissions unit with suspected DVT, of whom 270 underwent both plethysmography and venography. Plethysmography produced a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97% and a sensitivity of 90% for proximal DVT. It also produced a false negative rate of 10% for proximal DVT, For distal DVT, sensitivity was 66%, specificity 80%, positive predictive value 36% and NPV 93%. We conclude that the automated venometer report is a quick, non-invasive and easy to use initial screening test. However, it is not sufficiently accurate in a medical admissions unit to be a definitive diagnostic test for DVT and may, therefore, be best used in combination with clinical risk assessment and D-dimer assay with more definitive radiological investigations as necessary.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Emerg. Med. J.Home page
T Locker, S Goodacre, F Sampson, A Webster, and A J Sutton
Meta-analysis of plethysmography and rheography in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.
Emerg. Med. J., August 1, 2006; 23(8): 630 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Emerg. Med. J.Home page
K Hogg, D Dawson, and K Mackway-Jones
Investigating pulmonary embolism in the emergency department with lower limb plethysmography: the Manchester Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (MIOPED) study
Emerg. Med. J., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 94 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
C. Tovey and S. Wyatt
Diagnosis, investigation, and management of deep vein thrombosis
BMJ, May 29, 2003; 326(7400): 1180 - 1184.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.