BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armpilia, C I
Right arrow Articles by Croasdale, P L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armpilia, C I
Right arrow Articles by Croasdale, P L
British Journal of Radiology 75 (2002),590-595 © 2002 The British Institute of Radiology

Full Paper

Radiation dose quantities and risk in neonates in a special care baby unit

C I Armpilia, BSc(Hons), MSc, I A J Fife, BSc(Hons), MSc and P L Croasdale

Medical Physics Department, Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK

Radiographs are taken in the neonatal period most commonly to assist in the diagnosis and management of respiratory difficulties. Frequent accurate radiographic assessment is required and a knowledge of the radiation dose is necessary to justify such exposures. A survey of radiation doses to neonates from diagnostic radiography (chest and abdomen) has been carried out in the special care baby unit of the Royal Free Hospital. Entrance surface dose (ESD) was calculated from quality control measurements on the X-ray unit itself. Direct measurement of radiation doses was also performed using highly sensitive thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) (LiF:Mg,Cu,P), calibrated and tested for consistency in sensitivity. ESD, as calculated from exposure parameters, was found to range from 28 µGy to 58 µGy, with a mean ESD per radiograph of 36±6 µGy averaged over 95 examinations. ESDs as derived from TLD crystals ranged from 18 µGy to 58 µGy for 30 radiographic examinations. The mean energy imparted, the mean whole body dose per radiograph and the mean effective dose were estimated to be 14±8 µJ, 10±4 µGy and 8±2 µSv, respectively. Assuming that neonates and fetuses are equally susceptible to carcinogenic effects of radiation, which involve an overestimation of risk, the radiation risk of childhood cancer from a single radiograph was estimated to be of the order (0.3–1.3) x 10-6. Radiation doses compared favourably with the reference values of 80 µGy ESD published by the Commission of the European Communities in 1996, and 50 µGy published by the National Radiological Protection Board in 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. A. d. S. Lacerda, T. A. da Silva, and H. J. Khoury
Assessment of dosimetric quantities for patients undergoing X-ray examinations in a large public hospital in Brazil--a preliminary study
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2008; 132(1): 73 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
H. Datz, A. Ben-Shlomo, D. Bader, S. Sadetzki, A. Juster-Reicher, K. Marks, T. Smolkin, S. Zangen, and M. Margaliot
The additional dose to radiosensitive organs caused by using under-collimated X-ray beams in neonatal intensive care radiography
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, July 1, 2008; 130(4): 518 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S J Mutch and S D P Wentworth
Imaging the neonate in the incubator: an investigation of the technical, radiological and nursing issues
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 902 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E D Dougeni, H B Delis, A A Karatza, C P Kalogeropoulou, S G Skiadopoulos, S P Mantagos, and G S Panayiotakis
Dose and image quality optimization in neonatal radiography
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2007; 80(958): 807 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
V Tsapaki, I A Tsalafoutas, I Chinofoti, A Karageorgi, E Carinou, V Kamenopoulou, E N Yakoumakis, and E D Koulentianos
Radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations: a comparison between two methods
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2007; 80(950): 107 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
J van den Boom and M Battin
Chest radiographs after removal of chest drains in neonates: clinical benefit or common practice?
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2007; 92(1): F46 - F48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. Donadieu, A. Zeghnoun, C. Roudier, C. Maccia, P. Pirard, C. Andre, C. Adamsbaum, G. Kalifa, P. Legmann, and P.-H. Jarreau
Cumulative Effective Doses Delivered by Radiographs to Preterm Infants in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Pediatrics, March 1, 2006; 117(3): 882 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. Brindhaban and K. Al-Khalifah
Radiation dose to premature infants in neonatal intensive care units in kuwait
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, October 11, 2004; 111(3): 275 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.