BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, P M
Right arrow Articles by Reznek, R H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, P M
Right arrow Articles by Reznek, R H
British Journal of Radiology 75 (2002),573-577 © 2002 The British Institute of Radiology

Full Paper

Spleen size: how well do linear ultrasound measurements correlate with three-dimensional CT volume assessments?

P M Lamb, BSc, MRCP, FRCR, A Lund, DCR, DMU, R R Kanagasabay, BSc, MRCP, FRCS, A Martin, DCR, J A W Webb, MD, FRCP, FRCR and R H Reznek, FRCP, FRCR

St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK

Correspondence: Dr PM Lamb, 49 Stoneydeep, Twickenham Road, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 8BL, UK

Ultrasound measurement of splenic length is standard practice, but it is not known how well this represents the true size of the spleen. Previous studies, using a combination of measurements from in vivo and resected spleens, were subject to error because of changes in splenic size. The aim of this study was to correlate the dimensions of the spleen measured by ultrasound with the splenic volume measured by helical CT. Ultrasound examination was performed on 50 adult patients at the time of their attendance for abdominal CT. Linear dimensions of the spleen were measured with the patient first in the supine and then in the right lateral decubitus (RLD) position. The splenic volume was calculated from a three-dimensional reconstruction of the CT images. There was good correlation, using Spearman's rank correlation, between ultrasound measurements and CT volumes with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.7 for all parameters except one. The linear measurement that correlated most closely with CT volume was the spleen width measured on a longitudinal section with the patient in the RLD position (correlation coefficient (r)=0.89, p<0.001). There was also good correlation between splenic length measured in the RLD position and CT volume (r=0.86, p<0.001). We conclude that a good correlation exists between in vivo ultrasound assessment of splenic size and true splenic volume. The most accurate single measurement is spleen width measured on a longitudinal section with the patient in the RLD position. However, measurement of splenic length, which is the most commonly used in clinical practice, also correlates well with splenic volume, particularly when performed with the patient in the RLD position.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
R G Hosey, C G Mattacola, V Kriss, T Armsey, J D Quarles, J Jagger, D Vigil, and C M Lebrun
Ultrasound assessment of spleen size in collegiate athletes * Commentary * Commentary.
Br. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2006; 40(3): 251 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. S. Bezerra, G. D'Ippolito, S. Faintuch, J. Szejnfeld, and M. Ahmed
Determination of Splenomegaly by CT: Is There a Place for a Single Measurement?
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1510 - 1513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. L. Spielmann, D. M. DeLong, and M. A. Kliewer
Sonographic Evaluation of Spleen Size in Tall Healthy Athletes
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 45 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.