This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Power, N P Articles by Reznek, R H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Power, N P Articles by Reznek, R H

Optimization of scanning parameters for CT colonography

Departments of ¹ Radiology and ² Clinical Physics, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7EB, UK

To determine the optimal collimation, pitch and reconstruction interval for CT colonography, 10 spherical polyps between 1 mm and 10 mm diameter and made of tissue equivalent material with a CT number of 40 Hounsfield units (HU) were placed in the colon of an anthropomorphic phantom. The phantom was scanned at slice thicknesses of 3 mm, 5 mm and 7 mm and pitches of 1.0, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7 and 2.0 on an IGE Hispeed advantage system. Images were reconstructed for each scanning parameter at the minimum intervals allowed along the z-axis. The optimum scanning protocol was assessed by measuring maximum contrast between the polyp and air, sensitivity for detection of each polyp along the z-axis, and relative radiation dose. In addition, images were reviewed separately by two radiologists who graded polyp conspicuity as: 0, not seen; 1, faintly seen; 2, well seen. It was found that varying the scanning parameters caused a marked alteration in the maximum contrast between each polyp and air. For example, for the 5 mm polyp, the range of contrasts from best to worst case was 910–490 HU. It was noted that with contrasts of less than 500 HU, polyps were only faintly seen. A slice thickness of 3 mm with a pitch of 2 offers optimal polyp conspicuity with a relatively low radiation dose, we conclude that scanning parameters can be optimized for threshold contrast, radiation dose and subjective conspicuity. We propose an optimal parameter of 3 mm slice thickness and pitch 2.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. H. Kim, J. M. Lee, C.-I. Shin, H. C. Kim, J.-G. Lee, J. H. Kim, J. Y. Choi, H. W. Eun, J. K. Han, J. Y. Lee, et al. Effects of Spatial Resolution and Tube Current on Computer-aided Detection of Polyps on CT Colonographic Images: Phantom Study Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 492 - 503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Onodera, T. Omatsu, S. Takeuchi, N. Shinagawa, K. Yamazaki, T. Nishioka, and K. Miyasaka Enhanced Virtual Bronchoscopy Using the Pulmonary Artery: Improvement in Route Mapping for Ultraselective Transbronchial Lung Biopsy Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 1103 - 1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Hoppe, C. Quattropani, A. Spreng, J. Mattich, P. Netzer, and H.-P. Dinkel Virtual Colon Dissection with CT Colonography Compared with Axial Interpretation and Conventional Colonoscopy: Preliminary Results Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1151 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. K. Kalra, M. M. Maher, T. L. Toth, L. M. Hamberg, M. A. Blake, J.-A. Shepard, and S. Saini Strategies for CT Radiation Dose Optimization Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 619 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Wessling, R. Fischbach, N. Meier, T. Allkemper, J. Klusmeier, K. Ludwig, and W. Heindel CT Colonography: Protocol Optimization with Multi-Detector Row CT--Study in an Anthropomorphic Colon Phantom Radiology, September 1, 2003; 228(3): 753 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]