BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Essapen, S
Right arrow Articles by Tait, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Essapen, S
Right arrow Articles by Tait, D
British Journal of Radiology 75 (2002),162-169 © 2002 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Accuracy of set-up of thoracic radiotherapy: prospective analysis of 24 patients treated with radiotherapy for lung cancer

S Essapen, MRCP, FRCR 1 C Knowles 2 A Norman 2 and D Tait, MD, FRCR 1

Departments of 1Radiotherapy and Oncology and 2Computing and Information, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK

In thoracic radiotherapy, a number of factors hinder the use of portal films and electronic portal imaging devices for measuring field placement errors (FPEs). The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of treatment set-up using simulator check films (SCFs) in radiotherapy for lung cancer. Prospective evaluation was performed on 24 patients. During their radiotherapy, patients returned to the simulator weekly for a minimum of four SCFs, for which the parameters from the original simulator planning film were set, positioning being achieved without fluoroscopy. A total of 96 SCFs were taken. FPEs in left–right (L–R) and superior–inferior (S–I) direction, as well as coronal rotational errors, were measured. The mean absolute FPE was 0.35 cm in the L–R axis and 0.43 cm in the S–I axis. Statistically, the FPEs in the S–I direction were greater than those in the L–R direction (p<0.001). A margin of 0.93 cm between the clinical target volume and the planning target volume would cover 95% of FPEs in the L–R direction, whilst a margin of 1.13 cm is needed for this degree of certainty in the S–I direction. Mean coronal rotational error was 1.6°. Systematic errors were greater than random errors. This study demonstrated that the FPEs were within clinical tolerance (<=0.7 cm) in 84.9% of the measurements. The planning margins used in our clinical practice compare favourably with the FPEs in this study.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C M THOMPSON, C S HAMILTON, and J VAARKAMP
Thorax set-up verification with multiple oblique treatment portal images
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2009; 82(983): 950 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.