This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dhingsa, R Articles by Liddicoat, A J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dhingsa, R Articles by Liddicoat, A J

Assessment of agreement between general practitioners and radiologists as to whether a radiation exposure is justified

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK

The objective of this study was to assess agreement between General Practitioners (GPs) and Consultant Radiologists as to whether a radiation exposure is justified and whether a request conforms to the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) guidelines. Three GPs and three Consultant Radiologists were asked to review 100 requests for plain film imaging from GPs and to state whether the request justified a radiation exposure and whether the request conformed to RCR guidelines. It was discovered that there is greater agreement between radiologists than between GPs; this is a consistent pattern. The best agreement was between two Consultant Radiologists using the RCR guidelines. The poorest was between GPs using the request form details. It is suggested that the guidelines should be symptom-based to improve efficacy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y Balabanova, R Coker, I Fedorin, S Zakharova, S Plavinskij, N Krukov, R Atun, and F Drobniewski Variability in interpretation of chest radiographs among Russian clinicians and implications for screening programmes: observational study BMJ, August 13, 2005; 331(7513): 379 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]